My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Reso 2010-003
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Resolutions
>
2010
>
Reso 2010-003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 9:17:43 AM
Creation date
1/26/2010 9:17:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Resolution
Document Date (6)
1/19/2010
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
3B Public Hearing 2010 0119
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2010\Packet 2010 0119
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Potentially <br /> Significant <br /> Potentially Unless Less than <br /> Significant Mitigation Significant <br /> Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact <br />f. Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, ~ ~ ~ Q <br />Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, <br />or state habitat conservation plan? <br />Comment: The proposed ordinances will not result in any new <br />construction or physical improvements that could result in any biological <br />impacts. <br />V. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: <br />a. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical ~ ~ ~ Q <br />resource as defined in Sec. 15064.5? <br />Comment: The proposed ordinances will not result in any new <br />construction or physical improvements that could result in any impact to <br />cultural resources. <br />b. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an ~ ~ ~ Q <br />archaeological resource pursuant to Sec. 15064.5? <br />Comment: The proposed ordinances will not result in any new <br />construction or physical improvements that could result in any impact to <br />cultural resources. <br />c. Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or <br />unique geologic feature? <br />Comment: The proposed ordinances will not result in any new <br />construction or physical improvements that could result in any impact to <br />cultural resources. <br />d. Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal <br />cemeteries? <br />Comment: The proposed ordinances will not result in any new <br />construction or physical improvements that could result in any impacts to <br />cultural resources. <br />VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project: <br />a. Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, <br /> <br />including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: <br />---. <br />i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most <br />recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the <br />State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of <br />a known fault. Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special <br />Publication 42. <br />Comment: The proposed ordinances will not result in any new <br />construction or physical improvements. <br />ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? ~ ~ ~ Q <br />Comment: The proposed ordinances will not result in any new <br />construction or physical improvements <br />_.. ._ <br />iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? <br />Comment: The proposed ordinances will not result in any new <br />construction or physical improvements. <br />iv) Landslides? <br />Comment: The proposed ordinances will not result in any new <br />construction or physical improvements. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.