Reso 2010-035 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

boundary enrollment, grade reconfiguration, development of charter schools, and leasing of underutilized or vacant commercial space for school use. Implementation of these strategies, in tandem with General Plan policies and the mitigation measures already specified in the General Plan EIR and TOD Strategy EIR, will reduce impacts to less than significant levels. d) Adoption of the Housing Element would not by itself affect the demand for parks or the City's ability to maintain its existing parks. Although the housing accommodated by the Element would increase the city's population and lead to a demand for more parkland and recreational services, the impacts of this increase have already been analyzed in the EIRs for the General Plan and the TOD Strategy. Both of these EIRs concluded that this impact would be reduced to less than significant levels. The General Plan includes policies requiring new development to offset the demand for parkland by paying an impact fee (Policy 23.02), policies to develop new parks in underserved areas and on underdeveloped or vacant sites (Policies 22.03, 22.07), and policies to work with the East Bay Regional Park District to ensure that San Leandro receives its fair share of regional park benefits (Policies 23.04, 23.05). The General Plan also supports joint use agreements to increase access to school athletic fields and recreational facilities. The Housing Element would not increase development levels beyond the quantities that were already analyzed in the General Plan EIR and TOD Strategy EIR. Continued implementation of General Plan policies and compliance with the park dedication ordinance/ impact fee program will address future potential impacts. e) Adoption of the Housing Element would not affect other public facilities, including libraries, City administrative facilities, and public works maintenance yards. The impacts of future growth on these facilities has already been analyzed in the General Plan EIR and TOD Strategy E1R and was determined to be less than significant due to policies incorporated in the General Plan. PCYCENTIALLY POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT LESS THAN NO ISSUES SIGNIFICANT UNLESS SIGNIFICANT IMPACT SOLfRCES ISSliES MITIGATION IMPACT INCORPORATED 12. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: a. Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the X 1, 2 a licable Re Tonal Water Quality Control Board? b. Require or result in the construction of new water or X 1, 2 wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause si nificant environmental effects? c. Require or result in the construction of new storm X 1, 2 water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d. Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the X 1, 2 project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or ex anded entitlements needed? e. Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment X 1, 2, provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f. Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted X 1, 2 capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g. Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and X 1 re ulations related to solid waste? h.. Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and X 1 re ulations related to dischar e of storm waters? EXPLANATION: a) Adoption of the Housing Element would not exceed the wastewater treatment requirements of the Regional Water Quali Control Board. The uantity of development accommodated by the Element is within the envelo a analyzed Housing Element Initial Study and Negative Declaration 22 February 2010