My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
3A Public Hearing 2010 0517
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010
>
Packet 2010 0517
>
3A Public Hearing 2010 0517
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/14/2010 10:58:22 AM
Creation date
5/14/2010 10:58:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Staff Report
Document Date (6)
5/17/2010
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
_CC Agenda 2010 0517
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2010\Packet 2010 0517
Reso 2010-054
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
128
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Livermore, Kathleen <br />From: Janet Arnold [RubinArnol@aol.com] <br />Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 11:26 AM <br />To: Livermore, Kathleen <br />Subject: BRT, Yes! <br />You will soon be asked to vote on a "Locally Preferred Alternative" (LPA) for Bus Rapid <br />Transit (BRT) for our region. Along with TransForm, I am asking you to please vote in favor <br />of studying a robust BRT system with a maximum number of proposed stations and dedicated <br />lanes (also being called a "full-build LPA"), but in awareness that voting for a full build <br />LPA is not necessarily a vote in support of BRT. <br />I am aware that some merchants have begun to express concerns about impacts to parking and <br />that some residents have begun to express concerns about stop-spacing. However, I believe <br />that BRT can be implemented in a way that addresses these issues. <br />Existing bus stops at popular destinations for seniors and people with limited mobility could <br />and should be improved by locating BRT stations in their place. Shelter, seating, lighting, <br />and other security amenities would be welcomed at these stops as an improvement to existing <br />(or lack thereof) facilities, and could attract even more riders. <br />Our region can use BRT as an opportunity to improve existing parking conditions, such as <br />implementing a "performance-based pricing" strategy for parking along the BRT corridor. <br />Letting the market determine the cost of premium, on-street parking would lead to increased <br />revenues, 100% of which could be re-invested in the district where the revenues were <br />generated. Those new revenues could then be spent on a local shuttle service (like the Emery- <br />Go-Round), transit passes for local workers (Eco-passes), more lighting, increased security, <br />or other improvements desired by local merchants. Old Pasadena, and Redwood City offer <br />incredible examples of how to do this, as described in Donald Shoup's book "The High Cost of <br />Free Parking". <br />Increased traffic and other issues have all but eliminated transit reliability while <br />simultaneously increasing maintenance and operations costs. BRT offers a tremendous <br />opportunity to address these issues. However, without a study of "how much" BRT could be <br />implemented, we cannot know how to proceed. <br />Again, please vote in favor of studying a "full-build LPA" for BRT, which will then help us <br />determine which configuration, if any, would best serve the community. <br />Thank you for your time and service to the City. <br />Janet Arnold <br />1519 East 17th Street <br />Oakland, CA 94606 <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.