My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
3A Public Hearing 2010 0517
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010
>
Packet 2010 0517
>
3A Public Hearing 2010 0517
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/14/2010 10:58:22 AM
Creation date
5/14/2010 10:58:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Staff Report
Document Date (6)
5/17/2010
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
_CC Agenda 2010 0517
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2010\Packet 2010 0517
Reso 2010-054
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
128
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Livermore, Kathleen <br />From: Teresa Clarke [tkclarke2@yahoo.com] <br />Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 2:09 PM <br />To: Livermore, Kathleen <br />Subject: Yes! Let's Study BRT! <br />You will soon be asked to decide on what you would like AC Transit to study in their Final <br />Environmental Impact Report for Bus Rapid. Transit (BRT). I urge you to collaborate with <br />Oakland in keeping all of your options open by studying dedicated lanes and platform stations <br />in Berkeley and San Leandro along the proposed BRT route. <br />I know that there has been opposition to the project. By voting on the study of a full-build <br />BRT system, we will have a clearer idea of what the project really will mean to the <br />communities along the route. <br />We need to study the impacts and to begin to identify mitigation to real concerns that have <br />come up with respect to the impacts of the proposed dedicated lanes and stations on parking <br />and traffic. <br />However, before you vote, please consider the following: <br />1. While opponents are quick to point out complaints about BRT in other cities, they refuse <br />to acknowledge the successes of BRT. In every other city where BRT has been implemented, <br />ridership has gone up, businesses are thriving, and more pedestrian activity has been created <br />along the routes. You can confirm this by looking at recent publications about Cleveland's <br />BRT line and Eugene Oregon's BRT line: <br />2. There are 20,000 bus riders on this corridor everyday. There will likely be more in the <br />future. Please consider their needs for reliable service to get to schools, jobs, and medical <br />services that can only be provided by dedicated lanes. Without changes to the way this route <br />operates, AC Transit's operations costs for this line will continue to escalate, which could <br />lead to additional fare hikes or service cuts. <br />3. You can always vote against this project in the Fall if the concerns you are hearing are <br />not appropriately mitigated in the Final Environmental Impact Report. <br />AC Transit will do it's best over the next several months to address the concerns being <br />raised. I hope you will give them a chance, for the sake of the 20,000 current and future <br />transit riders, and in your search for alternatives to the status quo in light of our growing <br />awareness of climate change. <br />Again, please vote in favor of keeping our options open by studying a robust BRT system with <br />as much dedicated lane as possible. <br />Sincerely, <br />Teresa Clarke <br />2926 Otis St. <br />Berkeley, CA 94703 <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.