My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Reso 2001-020 RDA 2001-002
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Resolutions
>
2001
>
Reso 2001-020 RDA 2001-002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/20/2012 5:21:32 PM
Creation date
7/14/2010 11:39:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Resolution
Document Date (6)
2/5/2001
Retention
PERM
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Chapter III -Infill Development <br />III. Infill Development <br />As noted in Chapter I, the Revitalization Strategy area is San Leandro's best- <br />situatedarea for higher density development; close proximity to both Down- <br />townand BART make it unique in this regard. Four significant vacant and/or <br />underutilized properties are the focus of the Strategy's infill development rec- <br />ommendations: (see map on previous page) <br />1) The BART surface parking lot at the corner of San Leandro Boulevard <br />and West Juana Street; <br />2) The Westlake Site west of the BART station between Martinez and <br />Alvarado Streets; <br />3) The San Leandro Boulevard frontage west of the former City Corpora- <br />tion Yard site now proposed for approximately 200,000 square feet of <br />office space. <br />4) The area along north Alavarado Street between Davis Street and San <br />Leandro Creek. <br />New, transit- and dowrt'town-oriented Infill development is proposed for all <br />four sites: housing for the BART lot, office/R&D for the Westlake Site, and <br />either housing or office/R&D for the west San Leandro Boulevard frontage <br />and the north Alvarado Street area. Development programs for each of these <br />sites are outlined below. Design guidelines are provided in the Appendix. <br />BART Lot Housing & Replacement Parking <br />BART Lot Housing. A maximum of 200 units of multi-unit housing are pro- <br />posed for the BART parking site. At 2.2 acres, density would be approxi- <br />mately 90 units per acre, comparable to the Pacific Plaza condominiums to <br />the east. Building height would be four stories above apartially-submerged <br />parking garage, also similar to Pacific Plaza. <br />Design guidelines for this housing development and other potential Infill <br />projects are provided in the Appendix. The guidelines promote architectural <br />forms that are complementary to the attractive older single family cottages in <br />adjacent neighborhood areas, maintain aneighborhood-scale frontage with <br />regularly spaced building entrances and stoops that encourage residents to <br />walk to destinations within the downtown area, provide significant setbacks <br />along street frontages, maintain a residential streetscape and accommodate <br />frontage street trees that screen building mass. <br />A pedestrian way is recommended along the extension of the West Joaquin <br />Avenue right-of-way. This will provide a more attractive and direct route to <br />the station than via West Juana Street, serving existing area residents as well <br />as those in the new housing development. <br />Ownership housing-i.e., condominium development-is the higher density <br />housing type preferred for the site. However, due to liability concerns, few <br />condominiums are currently being developed by the private sector. In addi- <br />tion, BART has criteria for development of its properties that need to be ad- <br />dressed. Most important, new development should maximize transit rider- <br />ship. Housing projects should generally have a minimum density of from 50 <br />- 60 units per acre; on this site it would result in a minimum of 110-130 units. <br />BART also typically retains ownership of the land. This allows BART to (a) <br />maintain an income stream and thereby reduce the amount of public subsi- <br />dies needed for operation, and (b) ensure that land use remains transit-ori- <br />ented. <br />Given these factors, a project that mixes rental apartments and ownership <br />townhouses will be considered, provided the level of design and manage- <br />ment of the rental housing portion of the project is high. <br />- 31 - <br />Infill housing should have front porches to promote pedestrian activity. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.