My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
RDA Reso 2001-012
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Resolutions
>
2001
>
RDA Reso 2001-012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/4/2010 3:53:16 PM
Creation date
7/19/2010 9:41:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Resolution
Document Date (6)
10/1/2001
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
3A Public Hearing 2001 1001
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2001
RDA Agmt 2001 Batarse Family Trust UTA
(Approved)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agreements\2001
Reso 2001-158
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
V. VALUATION <br />The purpose of this analysis is to establish the value of the Site being conveyed to the <br />Developer, subject to the specific development program identified. The fair reuse value <br />is the fair market value for a developable site subject to the specific terms and conditions <br />of the DDA that control the reuse of the Site. <br />The valuation of real estate is derived principally through three approaches to market <br />value: the cost approach, the market data comparison approach, and the income <br />approach. From the indications of these separate analyses and the weight accorded <br />each, an opinion of value is reached, based on the quantity and quality of the factual <br />data considered, tempered by the judgment and experience of the appraiser who is <br />utilizing commonly accepted methods and techniques within the framework of the <br />appraisal process. Due to the fact that this appraisal is for the valuation of a future <br />development, the cost approach is not applicable. <br />The market data comparison approach to value is based upon the principle of <br />substitution; that is, when a property is replaceable in the market, its value tends to be <br />set at the cost of acquiring an equally desirable substitute property, assuming no costly <br />delay in making the substitution. The typical appraisal technique used to estimate <br />values through substitution involves the collection and analysis of sales and listings on <br />various properties having as many similar characteristics as possible to the property <br />being appraised. <br />The income approach is based upon the income characteristics of the proposed Project. <br />For the purpose of determining the reuse value, the reuse value is defined as the <br />difference between the cost to develop the Project, excluding land, and the total amount <br />the Developer (or investor) can afford to invest. The amount the Developer can afford is <br />based upon the projected net operating income revenue generated by the Project, the <br />present and anticipated cost to finance debt, and the required rate of return on equity. <br />Due to the absence of information on the income characteristics of the proposed project, <br />Conley Consulting Group (CCG) relied exclusively on the market data comparison <br />approach for valuation. <br />Although the developer is only acquiring a portion of the Yokota property, the highest <br />and best use appraisal was conducted for the entire Yokota property. As such, our fair <br />reuse valuation will compare sites on a price per SF basis and will focus on transactions <br />for parcels in the 150,000 SF to 400,000 SF range to allow for comparability to both the <br />entire Yokota property and the Site being acquired by the Developer, which is the <br />subject of the fair reuse valuation. <br />Conley Consulting Group Page 14 of 22 <br />9-9 Bartarse Reuse 10300.006 v5 September, 2001 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.