My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
RDA Reso 2000-004
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Resolutions
>
2000
>
RDA Reso 2000-004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/15/2010 4:07:57 PM
Creation date
7/20/2010 4:52:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Resolution
Document Date (6)
2/22/2000
Retention
PERM
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
123
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />LJ <br />6. Estimate the average total delay for each of the subject movements and <br />determine the level of service for each movement and for the intersection. <br />Gaps are utilized by vehicles in the following priority order. <br />1. Right toms from the minor street <br />2. Left toms from the major street <br />3. Through movements from the minor street <br />4. Left toms from the minor street <br />For example, if alert-fuming vehicle on the major street and a through vehicle from the minor <br />street are waiting to cross the major traffic stream, the first available gap of acceptable size would <br />be taken by the left-fuming vehicle. The minor street through vehicle must wait for the second <br />available gap. In aggregate terms, a large number of such left-turning vehicles could use up so <br />many of the available gaps that minor street through vehicles are severely impeded or unable to <br />make safe crossing movements. <br />Level of Service <br />See the following table "Level of Service Criteria for Unsignalized Intersections" for the <br />relationship between delay and level of service. <br />LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA <br />FOR UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS <br />AVERAGE DELAY LEVEL OF SERVICE DELAYS <br /><_ 5 s/veh A Little or no delay <br />> 5 and < 10 s/veh B Short traffic delays <br />> 10 and <_ 20 s/veh C Average traffic delays <br />> 20 and <_ 30 s/veh D Long traffic delays <br />> 30 and S 45 s/veh ~ E Very long traffic delays <br />Z 45 sfveh F Extreme traffic delays <br />The level of service criteria for Two-way STOP controlled intersections is somewhat different <br />from the criteria used in Chapter 9 for signalized intersections. The primary reason for this is the <br />difference is that drivers expect a signalized intersection to cant' higher traffic volumes than <br />unsignalized intersections. Additionally, several driver behavior considerations combine to make <br />delays at signalized intersections less onerous than at unsignalized intersections. <br />Reference: <br />Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report 209, Transportation Research Boazd, Update <br />October 1994 <br />.._ ~e~' V APP <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.