My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Reso 2001-152
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Resolutions
>
2001
>
Reso 2001-152
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/2/2010 1:22:01 PM
Creation date
9/2/2010 1:22:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Resolution
Document Date (6)
9/17/2001
Retention
PERM
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2002 Regional Transportation Program (RTIP) MTC Resolution No. 3404 <br /> Policies and Procedures - RTIP Project Application • Certification of Assurances <br /> RT1P Project Application <br /> Part 2: Certification of Assurances <br /> The implementing agency certifies that the project for which Regional Improvement Program funding is <br /> requested meets the following project screening Criteria. Please initial each. <br /> 1. The project is eligible for consideration in the RTIP. Pursuant to Streets and Highways Code Section 164 (e), <br /> eligible projects include improving state highways, local roads, public transit, intercity rail, pedestrian, and • <br /> bicycle facilities, and grade separation, transportation system managemegj trraansportation demand <br /> management, soundwall projects, intermodal facilities, and safety. <br /> 2. For the funds requested, no costs have/will be incurred prior to adoption into the STIP by the CTC.i" <br /> 3. A Project Study Report (PSR) or PSR equivalent has been prepared for the project. S <br /> 4. The project budget included in Part 2 of the project a ion reflects current costs updated as of the date of <br /> application and escalated to the appropriate year� <br /> 5. The project is included in a local congestion management program (CMP). (Note: For those counties that <br /> have opted out of preparing a CMP in accordance with Government Code Section 65088.3, the project must <br /> be consistent with the capital improvement prog ad pled pursuant to MTC's funding agreement with the <br /> countywide transportation planning agency.) <br /> 6. The year of funding for any design, right -of -way and/or construction phases has taken into consi ration the <br /> time necessary to obtain enviro ntal clearance and permitting approval for the project. <br /> 7. The project is fully funded. <br /> • <br /> 8. For projects with STIP federal funds, the implementing agency agrees to contact Caltrans and schedule <br /> complete a field review within six months of the project being adopted or amended into the STIP. <br /> 9. For STIP construction funds, the implementing agency agrees to send a copy of the Caltrans LPP 01 -01a-,. <br /> "Award Information for STIP Projects - Attachment A" to MTC and/or the CMA, upon award.}},--"‘" <br /> 10. The implementing agency agrees to be available for an audit of STIP funds, if requested./h+�" <br /> The implementing agency also agrees to abide by all rules and regulations applying to the State Transportation <br /> Improvement Program (S _,andd to follow all requirements associated with the fiords programmed to the <br /> project in the STIP. <br /> These include, but are not limited to: <br /> 1. Environmental requirements: NEPA standards and procedures for all projects with Federal funds; CEQA <br /> standards and procedures for all projects programmed with State funds. <br /> 2. California Transportation Commission (CTC) requirements for transit projects, formerly associated with the • <br /> Transit Capital Improvement (ICI) program. These include rules governing right -of -way acquisition, <br /> hazardous materials testing, and timely use of funds. <br /> 3. Federal Transit Administration (FTA) requirements for transit projects as outlined in FTA regulations and <br /> circulars. <br /> 4. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Caltrans requirements for highway and other roadway <br /> projects as outlined in the Caltrans Local Programs Manual. <br /> 5. Federal air quality conformity requirements, and local project review requirements, as outlined in the <br /> adopted Bay Area Conformity Revision of the State Implementation Plan (SIP). <br /> C, haerepolite, Trsosportanea Coon Page nay 23. 2001 <br /> • <br /> • <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.