My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Reso 2000-067
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Resolutions
>
2000
>
Reso 2000-067
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/10/2010 4:53:56 PM
Creation date
9/7/2010 4:33:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Resolution
Document Date (6)
5/15/2000
Retention
PERM
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Appendix E (Initial Study/Part 2) Page 6 <br /> 19. RECREATION. <br /> YES MAYBE NO SOURCE <br /> Will the proposal result in an impact upon the x 1, 2 <br /> quality or quantity of existing recreational <br /> opportunities? <br /> 20. CULTURAL RESOURCES. <br /> YES MAYBE NO SOURCE <br /> a. Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the x 1, 2 <br /> destruction of a prehistoric or historic <br /> archeological site? <br /> b. Will the proposal result in adverse physical or x 1, 2 <br /> aesthetic effects to a prehistoric, historic, or <br /> architecturally significant building, structure, or <br /> object? <br /> c. Does the proposal have the potential to cause a x 1, 2 <br /> physical change which would affect unique ethnic <br /> cultural values? <br /> 21. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. <br /> YES MAYBE NO SOURCE <br /> a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the x 2 <br /> quality of the environment, substantially reduce <br /> the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a <br /> fish or wildlife population to drop below self - <br /> sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or <br /> animal community, reduce the number or restrict <br /> the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal <br /> or eliminate important examples of the major <br /> periods of California history or prehistory? <br /> b. Does the project have the potential to achieve x <br /> short-term to the disadvantage of long -term, <br /> environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the <br /> environment is one which occurs in a relatively <br /> brief, definitive period of time while long -term <br /> impacts will endure well into the future). <br /> c. Does the project have impacts which are x 2 <br /> individually limited but cumulatively <br /> considerable? (A project may impact on two or <br /> more separate resources where the impact on each <br /> resource is relatively small, but where the effect of <br /> the total of those impacts on the environment is <br /> significant). <br /> Plazas 1 &2— IS - Part 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.