My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
3A Public Hearing 2010 1115
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010
>
Packet 2010 1115
>
3A Public Hearing 2010 1115
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/22/2010 10:02:34 AM
Creation date
11/10/2010 3:12:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Staff Report
Document Date (6)
11/15/2010
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
_CC Agenda 2010 1105
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2010\Packet 2010 1115
3A Public Hearing 2010 1115 Supplement
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2010\Packet 2010 1115
Ord 2010-021
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Ordinances\2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Medical Marijuana Dispensaries 2 November 15, 2010 <br />• In order to address both community and statewide concerns regarding the establishment <br />of medical marijuana dispensaries, marijuana cultivation facilities, or other land uses <br />deemed legal if a proposition to legalize marijuana is approved, it is necessary for the <br />City of San Leandro to study the potential impact such facilities may have on the public <br />health, safety, and welfare. <br />• Pursuant to Government Code section 65858, the adoption of an interim ordinance on an <br />urgency basis has an effective period of 45 days. Prior to expiration of this time period, <br />the City Council may extend the interim ordinance (by four -fifths vote) for a period <br />beyond 45 days through a noticed public hearing. <br />The City Council may extend the interim ordinance for a maximum period of 22 months <br />and 15 days. This would give a date of September 30, 2012 for expiration of the <br />ordinance. Another option is to extend the interim ordinance for 10 months and 15 days, <br />with the option of an additional one year renewal by subsequent City Council action. <br />Depending on City Council direction, staff anticipates the work necessary to amend the <br />Zoning Code can be completed within 3 -12 months based upon the level of regulation <br />that Council desires staff to research and implement. <br />To provide the City Council with the most comprehensive regulatory and fiscal options to review <br />and assess, staff recommends that the City Council extend the interim urgency ordinance to <br />September 30, 2012, or until Zoning Code amendments are adopted, whichever comes first. This <br />would continue the moratorium on the approval of any planning approvals, building permits, or <br />other entitlements that are necessary for establishment of any new medical marijuana <br />dispensaries, marijuana cultivation facilities or other land uses. <br />BACKGROUND <br />• In 1996 California voters approved Proposition 215, codified as Health and Safety Code <br />Section 11362.5 et. seq., entitled "The Compassionate Use Act of 1996." The intent of <br />Proposition 215 was to enable persons in need of medical marijuana for specified medical <br />purposes to obtain medical marijuana, and use it under limited, specified circumstances. <br />• The Legislature enacted SB 420 to clarify the scope of the Compassionate Use Act of <br />1996. <br />• Cities throughout California either prohibit medical marijuana dispensaries, marijuana <br />cultivation facilities and other related activities, have a moratorium banning them, or <br />allow them under certain conditions or through certain processes. <br />• Since the adoption of the interim urgency ordinance, Planning staff has been consulting <br />and working with other City departments, including the Police Department, the Finance <br />Department, and the City Attorney's Office, in addition to reviewing material from other <br />Alameda County cities (specifically Oakland, Berkeley, Hayward, Emeryville) on how <br />each jurisdiction has addressed issues related to such land uses in its Municipal Code. <br />Due to the complexity of the issues, related in part to the differences in state and federal <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.