My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
8A Consent 2011 0118
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2011
>
Packet 2011 0118
>
8A Consent 2011 0118
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/13/2011 4:53:15 PM
Creation date
1/13/2011 4:49:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Draft Minutes
Document Date (6)
12/20/2010
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
_CC Agenda 2011 0118
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2011\Packet 2011 0118
Minutes 2010 1220
(Superseded by)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Minutes\2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DRAFT MINUTES Page 8 <br />Cite of San Leandro Cite Council and San Leandro Redevelopment Agency Joint Meeting— December 20, 2010 <br />Rocky Trujillo, San Leandro resident, addressed the City Council, speaking in opposition <br />to the MOUs. Mr. Trijillo commented regarding the lack of information provided to the <br />public about the proposed agreements, and the public's perception about them. Mr. Trijillo <br />expressed concern that the City cannot afford to enter into the proposed contracts. <br />Lisa Jackson, San Leandro resident, addressed the City Council, commenting that she <br />believes it is inappropriate for the current Council to approve the MOUs, and delaying the <br />decision would help restore trust in City government. <br />Wayne Gregori, San Leandro resident, addressed the City Council, commenting that he <br />spoke with many residents during the election season, and many expressed concerned about <br />the fiscal management of the City. <br />Matt Maloon, Alameda County Building Trades Council and San Leandro resident, <br />addressed the City Council, urging the Council to approve the MOUs, and support the <br />workers who support the City. <br />Sharon Cornu, Alameda County Central Labor Council, addressed the City Council, <br />requesting that the Council honor the collective bargaining agreement by approving the <br />MOUs. <br />The City Council recessed from 8:16 p.m. to 8:29 p.m. <br />City Attorney Williams commented that the City has been engaged in a collective bargaining <br />process with the employee bargaining units pursuant to the Meyers- Milias -Brown Act, and <br />the matter before the Council is the result of the negotiation process based on the direction <br />given by the Council to its labor negotiators. Ms. Williams cautioned the Council that to <br />reopen the negotiations could expose the City to risk. She noted that collective bargaining is <br />by nature a confidential process, and state law allows the Council to meet in closed session <br />with its negotiators to provide direction relative to the terms and conditions to be negotiated. <br />Ms. Williams commented that a public negotiation process does not comport with federal law <br />or accepted bargaining practices. She noted that, while it is ultimately the Council's decision, <br />the City has been negotiating in good faith and in accordance with federal law. <br />A motion was made by Councilmember Prola, seconded by Councilmember Starosciak, to <br />adopt the resolutions approving the Memoranda of Understanding with SLCEA and SLMO. <br />Councilmember Prola thanked City employees for their sacrifices, including no pay raises for <br />five years; 18 furlough days in two years, equivalent to a seven percent pay cut; and <br />contributions to their medical benefits. He noted that payment of the eight percent <br />employees' share of PERS that the City negotiated with the bargaining units was in lieu of <br />cost of living increases, and saved the City money at the time. Councilmember Prola <br />commented that the agreements include a reopener in 2012 in the event the City needs to <br />consider additional furlough days. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.