Laserfiche WebLink
• Makes the City Clerk the office that receives requests for hearings and also responsible <br /> for setting the hearing date. <br /> • Defines "Administrative Hearing Body" within Chapter 1 -12 to mean 3 City department <br /> manager level employees designated by the City Manager "to hear and decide upon <br /> together" appeals. <br /> • Changes all references to "Hearing Body" within Chapter 1 -12 to "Administrative <br /> Hearing Body." <br /> • Establishes a mid -level review process where all Administrative Hearing Body decisions <br /> must first be appealed and reviewed by the City Manager before judicial review can <br /> occur. <br /> • Amends section 2-4 -256 to make the correct reference to refund procedure within the <br /> Utility Transfer Tax Appeals section. <br /> • Amends Chapter 3 -2 (Weed Abatement) to have appeals be heard by the Administrative <br /> Hearing Body pursuant to the Chapter 1 -12 procedures. <br /> • Eliminates the Charitable Solicitations Appeals Board and requires Charitable <br /> Solicitation appeals to be heard by the Administrative Hearing Body pursuant to Chapter <br /> 1 -12 procedures. <br /> • Establishes that appeals of administrative decisions related to the matters below are heard <br /> by the Administrative Hearing Body pursuant to Chapter 1 -12 procedures: <br /> o noise abatement <br /> o massage and acupuncture permits <br /> o mechanical or electronic amusement device licenses <br /> o adult oriented business permits <br /> o taxicab permits <br /> Fiscal Impact: <br /> It is anticipated that the fiscal impact of this legislation will reduce costs attributable to staff and <br /> attorney time spent at evening BZA hearings. There may be additional City Attorney time spent <br /> advising staff, and separately, advising the Administrative Hearing Body before, during and after <br /> hearings and during issuance of the Administrative Order. However, it is anticipated that a fee <br /> update will accrue to provide for recovey of some these costs from appeals applicants. Total <br /> fiscal impact of the proposed changes during inception would be nominal at most, and as staff <br /> becomes more efficient and familiar with the process could be a cost savings. <br /> Attachments <br /> Draft Ordinance <br /> Appeals Jurisdiction Matrix <br /> Conclusion <br /> The adoption of these text amendments will place appeals of notices of violations with the <br /> Administrative Hearing Body, which will make the appeals process more efficient for staff and <br /> residents alike without sacrificing legal due process. The additional text amendments will <br /> correct some internal SLMC inconsistencies. <br /> 1611532.1 <br />