Laserfiche WebLink
Potentially <br /> Significant <br /> Potentially Unless Loss than <br /> Significant Mitigation Significant <br /> Impact Incorporated Impact • No Impact <br /> a. Conflict with or obstruct Implementation of the applicable air quality plan? ❑ ❑ ❑ <br /> Comment: The proposed ordinances will not result In any new <br /> construction or physical Improvements that could result In any air quality <br /> Impacts. Any projects built pursuant to these code changes would be <br /> subject to their own, new Independent environmental review. These <br /> changes do not encourage development. <br /> • b. Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or ❑ ❑ • o <br /> projected air quality violation? <br /> Qomment: The proposed ordinances will not result In any new <br /> construction or physical Improvements that could result In any air quality <br /> • Impacts. Any projects built pursuant to these code changes would be • <br /> subject to their own, new Independent environmental review. These <br /> changes do not encourage development. <br /> c. Result in a cumulatively considerable net Increase of any criteria pollutant ❑ rX <br /> for which the project region Is non- attalninent under an applicable federal IJ <br /> • <br /> or state ambient afr quality standard (Including releasing emissions which <br /> exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? <br /> Comment: The proposed ordinances will not result in any new <br /> construction or physical Improvements that could result In any air quality <br /> impacts. Any projects built pursuant to these code changes would be <br /> subject to their own, new Independent environmental review. These <br /> changes do not encourage development. <br /> d. Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? <br /> El 0 m <br /> • Comment: The proposed ordinances will not result In any new <br /> construction or physical Improvements that could result In any air quality • <br /> Impacts. Any protects built pursuant to these code changes would be <br /> subject to their own, new Independent environmental review. These <br /> changes do not encourage development. <br /> e. Create objectionable odors effecting a substantial number of people? 0 ❑ 0 <br /> Comment: The proposed ordinances will not result In any new <br /> construction or physical Improvements that could result In any air quality <br /> impacts. Any projects built pursuant to these code changes would be <br /> • <br /> subject to their own, new Independent environmental review. These <br /> changes do not encourage development.. <br /> IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the protect: <br /> • a. Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat 0 0 r2r <br /> modifications, on any species Identified as a candidate, sensitive, or lJ <br /> special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or <br /> by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife <br /> Service? <br /> Comment: The proposed ordinances will not result In any new <br /> construction or physical Improvements that could result In any biological <br /> Impacts. Dept of Ffsh and Game have Issued the city a no effects° <br /> determination. <br /> b. Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive 0 0 121 <br /> natural community Identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations <br /> or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Ffsh and <br /> • W ildllfe Service? <br /> Comment: 'The proposed ordinances will not result In any new <br /> construction or physical Improvements that could result In any biological <br /> Impacts. The CA Dept of Fish and Game have Issued an 'no effects' letter. <br /> 4 <br /> • <br />