My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
8J Consent 2011 0404
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2011
>
Packet 2011 0404
>
8J Consent 2011 0404
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/11/2011 10:43:29 AM
Creation date
3/31/2011 5:12:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Staff Report
Document Date (6)
4/4/2011
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
_CC Agenda 2011 0404
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2011\Packet 2011 0404
Reso 2011-069
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
LIA ASSOCIATES. INC. CEQA INITIAL STUDY /MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION <br /> MARCH fbll PREOA STREET PIPE BRIDGES UPGRADE <br /> • <br /> SAN LEANDRO. CALIFORNIA <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED <br /> The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at <br /> least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact' as indicated by the checklist on the <br /> following pages. <br /> ❑ Aesthetics ❑ Agricultural Resources • Air Quality <br /> • Biological Resources • Cultural Resources • Geology /Soils <br /> • Greenhouse Gas Emissions • Hazards & Hazardous Materials • Hydrology/Water Quality <br /> ❑ Land Use/Planning ❑ Mineral Resources • Noise <br /> ❑ Population /Housing ❑ Public Services ❑ Recreation <br /> ❑ Transportation/Traffic ❑ Utilities /Service Systems • Mandatory Findings of Significance <br /> Determination. (To be completed by the Lead Agency.) <br /> On the basis of this initial evaluation: <br /> ❑ I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a <br /> NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. <br /> • I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not <br /> be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the <br /> project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. <br /> ❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. <br /> ❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant <br /> unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect I) has been adequately analyzed in an <br /> earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures <br /> based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT <br /> REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. <br /> ❑ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all <br /> potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE <br /> DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to <br /> that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are <br /> imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. <br /> Phil Millenbah. Senior Planner Date <br /> San Leandro Community Development Department <br /> P:tEG10801\CEQA'Preda_FINAL IS- MND.doc(07R8 /II) 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.