My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Reso 2011-069
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Resolutions
>
2011
>
Reso 2011-069
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/11/2011 10:19:28 AM
Creation date
4/11/2011 10:18:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Resolution
Document Date (6)
4/4/2011
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
8J Consent 2011 0404
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2011\Packet 2011 0404
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
L9A ASSOCIATES. INC. CEQA INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION <br /> MARCH 2011 PREDA STREET PIPE BRIDGES UPGRADE <br /> SAN LEANDRO. CALIFORNIA <br /> Less Than <br /> Significant <br /> Potentially with Less Than <br /> Significant Mitigation Significant No <br /> Impact Incorporated Impact Impact <br /> VIII. HAZARDS. Would the project: <br /> a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the Li L • Li <br /> environment through the routine transport, use, or <br /> disposal of hazardous materials? <br /> b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the Li • Li Li <br /> environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and <br /> accident conditions involving the release of hazardous <br /> materials into the environment? <br /> c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely L Li • Li <br /> hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one - <br /> quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? <br /> d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of ❑ Li ❑ • <br /> hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to <br /> Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, <br /> would it create a significant hazard to the public or the <br /> environment? <br /> e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, [J ❑ • Li <br /> where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles <br /> ofa public airport or public use airport, would the project <br /> result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in <br /> the project area? <br /> f) For a project located within the vicinity of a private ❑ Li ❑ • <br /> airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for <br /> people residing or working in the project area? <br /> g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an ❑ ❑ U • <br /> adopted emergency response plan or emergency <br /> evacuation plan? <br /> h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, Li Li ❑ • <br /> injury or death involving wildland fires, including where <br /> wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where <br /> residences are intermixed with wildlands? <br /> Affected Environment: <br /> The primary current and past land use along the banks of San Leandro Creek has been resource <br /> conservation. No development has occurred along the creek banks other than minor infrastructure <br /> improvements including the pipe bridges on the project site and the flood control channel downstream <br /> of the project site. None of these land uses would likely have resulted in contamination from <br /> hazardous materials. However, urban storm water run off containing petroleum products, household <br /> cleaners, pesticides, fertilizers and other contaminants may have impacted soils on the project site. <br /> P: \EGI0a0110EQA1Preda_FINAL IS- MND.doc(0328111) 34 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.