My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
10A Action 2011 0516 Supplement
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2011
>
Packet 2011 0516
>
10A Action 2011 0516 Supplement
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/16/2011 3:50:43 PM
Creation date
5/16/2011 3:50:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Staff Report
Document Date (6)
5/16/2011
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
10A Action 2011 0516
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2011\Packet 2011 0516
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
San Leandro Housing Element Implementation Program: 2010 Annual Element Progress Report — Table C <br /> pg. 18 <br /> Name of Coal/Program Action Objectives /Summary of Actions Timeframe in Status of Program Implementation <br /> II.E. <br /> Zoning Regulations • ction 59.0I-E: Undertake the following zoning changes to produce supportive housing and 2010 -2011 ADVANCE: No action to date. Zoning Code amendment(s) would require <br /> . upponive Housing residential hotels on appropriate sites: Council action. <br /> • d SROs a) Consider adding a definition of "Supportive housing" to the Zoning <br /> Code, and amending the lists of permitted and conditionally permined <br /> uses to indicate where this use is allowed. <br /> b) Make residential hotels a conditionally permined use in al least one of the <br /> DA zones. They are currently only a conditionally permitted use in the <br /> SA -1 zone. <br /> Zoning Regulations • ction 59.01 -F: Monitor the impacts of minimum density standards on development activity in the Ongoing ADVANCE: Staff shall seek to periodically evaluate minimum density standards <br /> lonitoring the Downtown TOD area to ensure they are reasonable and reflective of market when the housing market improves and more TOD developments are completed. <br /> 1 ffectiveness of conditions. While no changes to these standards are proposed now, they should be <br /> inimum Density periodically evaluated and compared to standards around other transit stations in <br /> standards the Bay Area. <br /> Consider amending the parking standards in the Zoning Ordinance: 2010-2011 ADVANCE: No action to date. Zoning Code amendments would <br /> Parking Standards ction 59.02 -A: ng O req uire <br /> endments to the a) Make the parking standards in the NA districts comparable to those in the Council action. <br /> 1' arking Requirements SA districts, reflecting the lower level of demand on high - volume transit <br /> corridors <br /> b) Allow a greater percentage of the parking spaces in multi - family housing <br /> near transit stations or along transit corridors to be uncovered. <br /> c) Eliminate guest parking requirements for buildings with less than 4 units. <br /> d) Lower the parking requirements for studio apartments from 1.5 to 1.25 <br /> spaces/ unit <br /> Permitting Procedures ction 59.03 -A: Maximize the potential benefits of the permit tracking system, one -stop permitting Ongoing ADVANCE: Regular City function <br /> 1 emit Streamlining = enter, and website to facilitate permit processing and the issuance of building <br /> permits. <br /> Development Fees • ction 59.04 -A: Fee Regularly review and update local development and permitting fees to ensure that Annual ADVANCE: Regular City function <br /> 1 eviews they are competitive with other communities in the East Bay. <br /> Development Fees Action 59.04 -13: Fee Develop a policy to reduce certain fees for affordable housing projects, except for Ongoing ADVANCE: No action to date. Stuff may implement this on an ongoing, project- <br /> !' eductions for school and park fees (excluding senior housing). Reductions or waivers should be by- project basis. <br /> foordable I lousing— considered for fees for use permits, rezoning, map filing, undergrounding in the <br /> sty East 14th Street corridor, and similar administrative fees. Ensure that reductions <br /> will not adversely affect the City's ability to provide services to the project. <br /> Development Fees • ction 59.04 -C: Fee Work with EBMUD and other utilities to explore reductions to connection and Ongoing ADVANCE: No action to date. Staff may consider implementing this on an <br /> r eductions for system capacity fees for affordable housing projects. ongoing, project -by- project basis. <br /> • (fordable Housing— <br /> It Agencies <br /> "ACIIIEPED onnmrc, the action has bras ac o 11. hd.. whirr "ADVANCE" it is ongoing or should be aortal foment ro 2011.2014. "REPLACE " memo the arrim 'Mold be replaced with a new ar maafud program ro army out the paltry. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.