My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Airport Highlights 2005 0203
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Committees
>
Airport Committee
>
Airport Highlights 2005 0203
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/1/2011 3:33:44 PM
Creation date
7/1/2011 3:33:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Committee Highlights
Document Date (6)
2/3/2005
Retention
PERM
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• • <br /> City of San Leandro <br /> Civic Center, 835 E. 14th Street m I r� 14 . San Leandro, California 94577 1 i i� 1 t z.. I� ntw__,, ;Hi"' ' � <br /> Office of the City Manager 510 -577 -3351 <br /> FAX 510 -577 -3340 <br /> January 21, 2005 <br /> Ms. Kristi McKenney, Aviation Planning Manager <br /> Mr. Doug Mansel, Aviation Planner <br /> Port of Oakland <br /> 530 Water Street <br /> Oakland, CA 94604 <br /> Subject: San Leandro's Recommendations for Potential Terminal Development <br /> Concepts <br /> Dear Ms. McKenney and Mr. Mansel: <br /> The San Leandro members of the Airport Master Plan Stakeholder Committee <br /> respectfully submit the following recommendations for planning for potential terminal <br /> development at the Oakland International Airport. Our reconunendations are predicated <br /> on the following positions: <br /> 1. San Leandro Stakeholder Committee members cannot support any concept that would <br /> facilitate diversion of traffic from South field to North field. <br /> 2. We cannot support any concept that would develop terminal facilities at the space <br /> currently occupied by the Oakland Maintenance Center Hangar. <br /> 3. San Leandro will not support expansion of any terminal facilities beyond what the <br /> current airfield can support. When OAK reaches current airfield capacity, expansion <br /> should stop. <br /> • <br /> Based on these positions, the consensus of our committee members is that Concept 2B as <br /> presented to the Master Plan Stakeholder Committee would be the best to consider for <br /> possible future study. This appears to be the most comprehensive solution presented to <br /> date. It addresses the need for more terminal space, more parking with potential garage <br /> expansion, better vehicle circulation, and upgrades to existing facilities. <br /> However we would prefer to see 15 new gates versus 20. We ask that you plan for the <br /> low side of anticipated passenger numbers versus the high side. Eliminating the southern <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.