Laserfiche WebLink
• • <br /> • • 2G would create ground traffic conflicts for planes between terminals. It would also <br /> create significant distance between parking and existing terminals. <br /> Concepts 3A and 3B <br /> • Again, San Leandro cannot support any concept that will eliminate wetlands, <br /> including bay in -fill. <br /> • Regarding 3A, adding new gates without other facility enhancements (i.e. parking, <br /> drop -off areas) will only add to congestion. <br /> The following questions remain regarding the concepts that have been presented to the <br /> committee. <br /> • Please show the existing and potential future surface parking on concept maps. <br /> • Are you still assuming one main runway will support up to 75 gates? <br /> • Would a new parallel taxiway parallel to Taxiway B ultimately be needed to avoid the <br /> same conflicts suggested by 2C — 2F? <br /> Thank you for the opportunity to present our committee member recommendations. We <br /> look forward to receiving more detailed information about the Port's vision of future <br /> terminal expansion as the Master Plan progresses. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> Kathy Omelas <br /> Community Relations Representative <br />