Laserfiche WebLink
• • <br /> • <br /> repairs. (Large air carrier aircraft will prefer a precision approach to 27L, <br /> the longer runway.) At night, all arrivals would be encouraged to use 27L <br /> to keep aircraft farther away from nearby homes. This noise abatement <br /> procedure exists today and would be strengthened with an ILS on 27L. <br /> • Visual approaches — With two ILS's, guidance for visual approaches to <br /> either runway would be more precise, which enhances safety. Most arrivals <br /> into North Field are visual approaches. The Aircraft Owners & Pilots <br /> Association estimates that only about 10% of pilots are certified to fly IFR. <br /> Consequently, most general aviation arrivals into North Field will continue to <br /> use visual approaches. In addition, most general aviation pilots will continue <br /> to prefer landing on 27R because it is closer to aircraft parking and decreases <br /> taxi time. <br /> e ILS on 27L — Most IFR traffic will prefer landing on 27L, the longest runway <br /> on North Field. <br /> • ILS on 27R keeps altitudes higher. If the ILS is removed from 27R, <br /> instrument landings could still occur but they would use non - precision <br /> approach techniques. An advantage to keeping an ILS on 27R is that the ILS <br /> glide slope keeps aircraft on a "continual descent" approach to the runway, <br /> which often results in higher altitudes as aircraft approach the runway. Non - <br /> precision, "step down" approaches tend to put aircraft at lower altitudes <br /> farther from the runway than continual descent approaches. <br />