10A Action 2011 0718 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

place to sit and have a morning cup of coffee. If built according to the present design, our yard and Family Room would not receive any direct sunlight until at least 10 or 11 am. We would effectively have a shaded canyon 19 feet deep on one side, 18 feet wide and 9 feet deep on the remaining side; the sunlight available to the Patio, planting and home interior will be dramatically less. The ventilation and air patterns in the yard are also likely to be adversely impacted. The privacy of our vnrd snare and the Familv Room will also be compromised by the placement of this addition. The windows of the addition at both levels are in alignment with the sliding glass door of the Family Room. The items listed above are not minimized impacts, an intent stated by the City Standards. Up to Tuesday March 22"d, when the story poles ware placed, we had no idea that this addition was planned even though the owners were strongly counseled by the City Planning Staff to seek neighbor feedback. I feel there are several better design opportunities available to the applicants. I have been a Registered Architect in California since 1974 and have participated in numerous projects of a similar nature. There are ways to design this addition without creating the adverse impact to the City and to our home. 1. The addition could be partially or wholly "second storied" onto the existing home. This would allow a better integration of the new added space to the existing character of the home; also it would relieve our yard space from becoming a deep dark hole. 2. This property has a 53' deep rear yard available for use. A one story addition, of equal interior square footage, could be placed within standard setbacks and well under the Floor Area Ratio of 50% and still with an ample back yard area. There is no need to make a 2 -story addition to accomplish the same goal. Pursuant to Section 580 (H) (1), the Zoning Enforcement Official can enforce the standards with the intent that: "the addition should be consistent with the existing residence...... or the existing residence should be remodeled concurrently with construction of the proposed addition in order to achieve the desired consistency." I feel that in this review, the applicants should be informed that the present design has too much negative impact on San Leandro and their neighbors. A redesign by the applicant is appropriate. I can provide numerous photographs of remodels where the owner and designer have taken the responsibility seriously to prevent the project from standing out as a "tacked on box". The City Zoning Ordinances are created for the benefit of all residents of San Leandro. This situation is exactly what the ordinances are intended to prevent, an insensitive design disrespectful of the local residents and the character of City of San Leandro. There are too many bad examples from the past; we do not need more in the future. The application of the existing ordinances, in a direct way, is appropriate to prevent more mistakes. Si cerely, Lz Harry Meta as Louise Metaxas 900 Dowling Blvd. San Leandro, CA 94577 (510) 632-9112 Page 2 of 2