10A Action 2011 0718 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Appeal of the BZA Approval of PLN2011-00014 July 18, 2011 4 of the roof of the addition exactly matches the pitch and style of the front of the existing dwelling, and the stucco exterior of the existing home will be carried through with the addition. The half -circle window feature on the front of the home is carried through on the front and rear of the addition and the other new windows will be sliders to match the existing ones, providing consistent application for a cohesive appearance. • Section H.2 provides that the visual mass of the resulting addition should be de- emphasized and "in -scale with the surrounding homes". The applicant eliminated an attic area above the second story addition specifically to keep the roof height as low as possible: at 21 feet, five inches at the ridge, it is well below the 30 -foot roof height permitted. The low -profile setting of the addition and orientation at the rear minimizes the impacts on the adjacent neighbors as well as neighborhood streetscape. A majority of the homes in the immediate block of the project site are two-story. • Section H.3 provides that the proposal value the existing visual character of the neighborhood, fitting in to the neighborhood's existing architectural context "utilizing a compatible architectural vocabulary". The immediate neighborhood is a mix of architectural styles, as the homes were developed at different times between 1924 and 1960. As a result, there is no one predominant architectural style for the neighborhood, though it should be noted a majority of the homes within a block of the project site are two-story. The addition is designed to carry through compatible architectural features of the Spanish Colonial Bungalow style of the existing home. The addition will be approximately 70 feet back from the sidewalk and, combined with the low -slung design, should not negatively impact the neighborhood's existing visual character. • Section HA provides that the physical impacts to the neighbors should be minimized and that the addition should not "substantially impair the privacy and access to light and air of adjacent residences, while balancing the applicant's ability to improve the subject property in accordance with all applicable restrictions ". To address issues of access to light and air, as well as to limit the impacts of bulk and mass on adjacent properties, the proposal must comply with Zoning Code Section 2-537 Daylight Planes in R Districts. "Daylight Plane" means a height limitation that, when combined with the maximum height limit, defines the building envelope within which all new structures or additions must be contained. All plans for new homes and additions must include an architectural illustration for each side of the building showing compliance with this requirement. As indicated on Exhibit "C" in the June 2nd BZA Staff Report (See Attachment #4), the illustration shows that the proposed addition is within the building envelope and does not encroach into the daylight plane. (However, the roof eaves are permitted to extend two (2) feet into a required side yard as well as within the daylight plane, per Zoning Code Section 4-1654.A.) To further address privacy concerns that were expressed by the appellant prior to the ZEO's decision, the approval was conditioned with a requirement that the plans be revised to show the two new windows on the west (or left) elevation of the second story to either 1) be re- designed/positioned upward, or 2) if kept the same size and location, shown with the addition of opaque screening added to the bottom portion of each window to prevent direct viewing into the appellant's side yard. Subsequently, plans recently submitted after