Laserfiche WebLink
Medical Marijuana Moratorium 3 September 6, 2011 <br />DISCUSSION <br />Report Per California Government Code section 65858(d) <br />Government Code section 65858(d) requires a written report describing the measures taken to <br />alleviate the condition which led to the adoption of the ordinance. This Staff Report explains the <br />City's activities and measures taken for the period since November 15, 2010, when the urgency <br />ordinance was extended by 10 months and 15 days to September 30, 2011. <br />City staff from the Police Department, City Attorney's Office and Community Development <br />Department reviewed material from other cities and counties in California with respect to their <br />laws regulating medical marijuana dispensaries and cultivation facilities, including, but not <br />limited to, Alameda, Albany, Berkeley, Dublin, Emeryville, Fremont, Hayward, Livermore, <br />Newark, Oakland, Piedmont, Pleasanton, Union City, Sebastopol, Santa Cruz, Santa Barbara, <br />South San Francisco, Redding, Rocklin, Shasta Lake, San Diego, Alameda County, Modoc <br />County, and Tehama County. Staff also reviewed recent newspaper articles and other literature, <br />including the White Paper on Maryuana Dispensaries by the California Police Chiefs <br />Association's Task Force on Marijuana Dispensaries, Attorney General's Guidelines for the <br />Security and Non - Diversion of Marijuana Grown for Medical Use (August 2008), American <br />Planning Association Planning Magazine (May /June 2010), HCED (Housing, Community and <br />Economic Development) Listsery regarding medical marijuana dispensaries and cultivation, as <br />well as information from the U.S. Attorney General's office and Alameda County District <br />Attorney's Office. <br />On November 8, 2010, the City Council held a work session to review legal issues related to <br />medical marijuana dispensaries and cultivation facilities, including the Qualified Patients <br />Association v. City of Anaheim (2010) case (Case No. G040077). At the February 28, 2011 City <br />Council work session, staff presented information to the City Council for review and <br />consideration. On February 28, 2011, the City Council directed staff to prepare an ordinance <br />prohibiting land uses related to Medical Marijuana Dispensaries and Cultivation Facilities. Staff <br />prepared the ordinance and attachments for the May 16, 2011 City Council meeting. At the May <br />16, 2011 City Council meeting, the City Council expressed a desire to continue to gather <br />additional information from other municipalities regarding their Medical Marijuana ordinances <br />relative to cultivation facilities. The City Council noted that key information regarding <br />cultivation facilities was still in a state of flux. <br />Staff continues to research, and gather information related to the regulation of marijuana <br />cultivation facilities. The moratorium is necessary to allow City staff to disseminate the <br />information, analyze it, formulate a recommendation, and present to the City Council for their <br />review and further direction. <br />Current City Council Policy <br />Not applicable <br />Previous City Council Action(s) <br />The City Council adopted an interim urgency ordinance and moratorium on Medical Marijuana <br />Dispensaries in late 2004 and early 2005. At the conclusion of the moratorium, the City took no <br />further action to amend its Zoning Code to address marijuana dispensaries, or cultivation <br />facilities. <br />