Laserfiche WebLink
youth spending time in adult facilities so elected and appointed officials could develop more effective <br />juvenile justice policies and support the passage of the bill. <br />The Prison Rape Elimination Act was originally signed into lacy by President Bush in 2003 to address sexual <br />violence behind bars. A key component of the lacy was the creation of the National Prison Rape Elimination <br />Commission ( NPREC), a bipartisan federal commission charged with developing national standards <br />addressing prisoner rape and the requirements would apply to all detention facilities, including federal and <br />state prisons, jails, police lock -ups, private facilities, and immigration detention centers. The NPREC held <br />public hearings, had expert committees to draft the standards and released their final recommendations by <br />issuing a report and set of standards (available online at http: www.ncirs.gov pdffiles] 226680.pdf <br />Who supports PREA? <br />American Probation and Parole Association <br />Correctional Education Association <br />International Community Corrections Association <br />National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers <br />National Center on Domestic and Sexual Violence <br />Missouri Youth Services Institute <br />Campaign for Youth Justice <br />American Jail Association <br />National Juvenile Detention Association <br />Center for Children's Law and Policy <br />Familv Violence Prevention Fund <br />National Alliance to End Sexual Violence <br />'This is only a partial list of national supporters <br />» » » »» <br />5. RESOLUTION CALLING FOR THE REPLACEMENT OF THE DEATH PENALTY WITH <br />THE SENTENCE OF LIFE IMPRISONMENT WITHOUT THE POSSIBILITY OF <br />PAROLE <br />Source Council Member Joseph Lyons, City of Claremont <br />Referred To : Public Safetv Policy Committee <br />Recommendation to General Resolutions Committee <br />WHEREAS the administration of the death penalty costs California taxpayers hundreds of millions <br />of dollars more to administer than life imprisonment without the possibility of parole; <br />WHEREAS death penalty cases cost County taxpayers millions of dollars more to prosecute than <br />cases that seek life imprisonment without the possibility of parole; <br />WHEREAS the non - partisan California Commission on the Fair Administration of Justice Senate <br />Commission concluded that California's death penalty system is systemically dysfunctional and will require <br />hundreds of millions of dollars to reform; <br />WHEREAS the death penalty is not a deterrent and does not make our Cities or the State of <br />California a safer place to live; <br />WHEREAS California's Cities face severe cuts to the services needed to keep their neighborhoods <br />safe and have had to resort to layoffs and furloughs because of reductions in revenues from State and County <br />sources; <br />WHEREAS the millions of dollars in savings realized by replacing the death penalty with life <br />without the possibility of parole could be spent on: education, roads, police officers and public safety <br />programs, after - school programs, drug and alcohol treatment, child abuse prevention programs, mental health <br />services, and services for crime victims and their families. <br />14 <br />