Laserfiche WebLink
five years to be re- invested in public safety measures like law enforcement and education. There are three <br />ways to accomplish this addressed in this resolution: <br />1. Governor Brown should convert all existing death sentences to Life Without Parole <br />The governor has the authority to convert death sentences to the alternative of Life Without Parole, saving $1 <br />billion over five years. This will allow the more than 700 existing death row inmates to be re- housed in the <br />general population, eliminating the additional housing costs associated with death row and the cost of <br />prosecuting and defending death row appeals. Three states have enacted this reform in the past to ensure that <br />innocent men and women sentenced to death will not be executed and to save funds spent on maintaining <br />death row. Life Without Parole is a real solution that ensures public safety and effectively punishes horrible <br />crimes. It also allows inmates to work and pay restitution to the Victims' Compensation Fund. Recent polling <br />from David Binder Research indicates that 64% of likely voters in California support this reform as a <br />budgetary measure. <br />2. County District Attorneys should reduce or end the practice of seeking death sentences <br />According to Judge Alarcon and Prof. Mitchell's study, each prosecution seeking death costs the county <br />approximately $1 million more than a prosecution seeking Life Without Parole. The decision to seek the <br />death penalty over the alternative of Life Without Parole falls to each county's District Attorney. According <br />to the ACLU's 2009 report "Death in Decline '09," most counties in the state currently do not seek the death <br />penalty, or do so very rarely, due to the excessive costs of such prosecutions. However, a small number of <br />counties continue to seek the death penalty, at great expense to the cities within the county and the taxpayers <br />of the state at large. When the county district attorney decides to seek the death penalty, even-one within the <br />county is impacted as the entire county criminal justice system strains to accommodate the massive <br />expenditures associated with a death penalty trial. Justice is slowed for everyone. <br />The ACLU's 2011 report, "The Death Penalty is Dead," showed a dramatic decrease in the number of death <br />sentences in California in the first half of 2011, leaving the state on track to sentence the fewest men and <br />women to death since 1978. Los Angeles County, historically the state's leader in death sentences, also saw a <br />substantial decline in the first half of 2011. This trend should be encouraged and all County District <br />Attorneys should be called upon to reduce or eliminate the practice of seeking the death penalty. <br />3. The California Legislature should pass SB 490 and give voters the option to replace the death <br />penalty on the November 2012 ballot <br />SB 490 is currently under consideration by the California legislature. If passed, voters will be given the <br />option of replacing the death penalty with Life Without Parole, saving $1 billion over five years. California <br />voters have not had an opportunity to vote on maintaining the death penalty since 1978, and have never been <br />made aware of the costs associated with the system. Don Heller, the author of the 1978 initiative to reinstate <br />California's death penalty, now supports its replacement because of the death penalty's costly failure over <br />the last 30 years. Numerous attempts to streamline, speed up, and reduce waste within the death penalty have <br />been made, but all have failed and often result in increasing the cost of the system. Voters should be given a <br />chance to make an educated decision about whether the death penalty is worth $184 million each year, or if <br />there are more productive ways to invest those funds. <br />» » » »» <br />RESOLUTION REFERRED TO GENERAL ASSEMBLY <br />6. RESOLUTION IN HONOR OF THE CITY OF BELL <br />Source Council Member Tony Cardenas, City of Los Angeles <br />Referred To : General Assemblv <br />16 <br />