My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
FacilitiesTransportation Highlights 2011 1011
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Committees
>
Facilities & Transportation Committee
>
FacilitiesTransportation Highlights 2011 1011
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/1/2011 4:59:02 PM
Creation date
11/1/2011 4:58:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Committee Highlights
Document Date (6)
10/11/2011
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
_CC Agenda 2011 1107
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2011\Packet 2011 1107
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City -wide <br />PCI Improvement Alternative <br />• Pro's <br />-- Simple Prioritization Process <br />— Streets selected and repair method based on effectiveness <br />of treatment and overall City PCI improvement <br />--- More streets are repaired <br />— Maintenance Area approach focuses work each year <br />• Con's <br />— Program logic depends on a reasonably close relationship <br />between need and funding <br />— Low PCI streets will not receive any treatment unless <br />significantly more funding is available <br />— Street segments selected may not be arranged for optimum <br />constriction efficiency <br />Blended Method Alternative <br />Pros <br />— Provides some funding for streets in the poorest condition <br />but preserves funds for extending PCI life <br />--- Reconstructed neighborhood streets are selected to <br />compliment rejuvenation program <br />— Streets are selected in neighborhoods so "why not my <br />street ?" concerns are reduced <br />-- Attempts to strike a balance between city -wide PCI <br />improvement, repairing streets in very poor condition, and <br />maintenance cost reduction <br />— Streets are grouped for construction efficiency and savings <br />• Con's <br />— Committee uses various information to select streets. May <br />not appear to be as objective as other methods <br />10/11/2011 <br />J <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.