My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
3B Public Hearing 2011 1121
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2011
>
Packet 2011 1121
>
3B Public Hearing 2011 1121
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/14/2011 2:12:41 PM
Creation date
11/15/2011 5:31:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Staff Report
Document Date (6)
11/21/2011
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
_CC Agenda 2011 1121
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2011\Packet 2011 1121
8F Consent 2011 1205
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2011\Packet 2011 1205
Reso 2011-193
(Amended)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
190
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Excerpt of the Draft Minutes from October 20, 2011 Planning Commission Meeting <br />Item 7: Public Hearing <br />a. PLN2009- 00006; Planned Development and Condominium [Vesting Tentative Tract] Map; <br />General Plan Map Amendment from Office to High Density Residential; rezone from P(AU)- <br />Professional with Assembly Use Overlay to RM- 1800(PD)- Residential Multi - Family with <br />Planned Development Overlay; Development Agreement (DA); and an Initial Study, a <br />Mitigated Negative Declaration and a Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program; to build a <br />new residential development consisting of 66 rental apartment units: 17 one - bedroom <br />apartments, 48 two- bedroom apartments and one manager's unit in a Recreation Building <br />with other site amenities at 2450 Washington Avenue. <br />The project comprises seven apartment buildings with five units per building; five apartment <br />buildings with six units; a Recreation building with manager's unit; and private roads, <br />landscaping, surface and attached parking for 135 parking spaces. (Assessor's Parcel <br />Numbers 77D- 1410 -25 and 77 -556 -104; W.M. Mathews, Inc. (Applicant and Property <br />Owner); P- Professional Zoning District) ( Barros). <br />Senior Planner Barros presented the staff report via (PowerPoint presentation). She indicated that the <br />Planning Commission has twice discussed proposals for the subject property in work sessions, and after <br />tonight's public hearing, the current proposal is tentatively scheduled to go to the City Council in <br />November 2011. She said that following up on input from those work sessions, staff and the applicant <br />have worked out a number of planning issues as well as legal matters, including a new Development <br />Agreement (DA). <br />The project site, once occupied by a Singer -Friden office building, now contains a medical office building <br />of approximately 43,000 square feet and encompasses nearly three acres adjacent to the Sandpiper <br />condominiums on the north and other residential properties on the east. Although some former Singer - <br />Friden parcels left a legacy of soil contamination on proximate land, Senior Planner Barros explained, this <br />parcel was never contaminated. The owner proposes tearing down the existing medical office building on <br />the site and replacing it with a complex of 66 units. <br />As Senior Planner Barros explained, the proposed design has evolved considerably from the one the <br />Planning Commission first reviewed, particularly in terms of building massing and architectural detail, <br />including more complex roof lines. The original design included only six buildings; split now into 12 <br />buildings with paseos between them. A total of 135 parking spaces, in attached garages and open stalls, <br />meet requirements for parking, Senior Planner Barros said. The extensively landscaped community <br />building fronting Washington Avenue would be the site's primary architectural feature. As for open <br />space, she said that the proposal exceeds by approximately double the amount of open space required of a <br />multi - family project. In the emails about the project that the City received, neighbors raised questions <br />about traffic and inclusionary housing. As regards traffic, Senior Planner Barros said, the analysis by the <br />City's traffic engineers indicates that a 43,000- square -foot office building would produce more traffic <br />than a 66 -unit residential development. The rate of occupancy is not something staff can consider, she <br />added, noting that the analysis is based on the capacity of the built environment, whether offices or <br />apartments. In terms of inclusionary housing, Senior Planner Barros stated that recent case law prohibits <br />California cities from requiring inclusionary housing on residential rental units. <br />Turning to the General Plan land -use map and zoning map, Senior Planner Barros indicated that the <br />proposed residential multi - family designation is compatible with those along the east side of Washington <br />Avenue. The condominium map the developer proposes as part of his estate planning would allow his <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.