Laserfiche WebLink
Commissioner Rennie asked whether the developer and the Sandpiper people could get together to agree <br />on a common fence rather than having separate fencing on each property. Commissioner Crow agreed <br />that a single fence made sense and would be more aesthetically pleasing than two fences. Commissioner <br />Dlugosh disagreed, pointing out that we don't know how the Sandpiper property is owned, or how <br />difficult it might be to try to negotiate a common fence that would satisfy all those involved. <br />Commissioners Reed said that he also believes it's up to the individual property owners to work it out if <br />they want to. <br />Commissioner Fitzsimons said that he commends the developer and architect for coming up with an <br />architecturally distinct project that he would want to live in. Commissioner Fitzsimons said that the extra <br />care put into this project reflects the fact that the developer's proposal is part of his estate planning. He <br />also said he regretted hearing Mr. Brooks' pessimism about the timetable, but at the same time he <br />understands the economic reality. <br />Vice Chair Abero also commended the applicant for doing an excellent job of incorporating many of the <br />Planning Commission's prior comments so effectively. <br />Motion to Forward Resolution to City Council, <br />Amended to Include Noise Attenuation as a Recommended Condition of Approval <br />Fitzsimons / Abero: 7 Aye, 0 No <br />