My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Inst 2011 Agmt Wm Mathews Inc
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Recorded Documents
>
2011
>
Inst 2011 Agmt Wm Mathews Inc
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/13/2011 9:18:06 AM
Creation date
12/13/2011 9:17:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Agreement
Recorded Document Type
Development Agreement
Retention
PERM
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2.5. Processing Subsequent Approvals. <br /> 2.5.1. Processing of Subsequent Approvals. City will accept, make <br /> completeness determinations, and process, promptly and diligently, to completion all <br /> applications for Subsequent Approvals for the Project, in accordance with the terms of this <br /> Development Agreement. <br /> 2.5.2. Scope of Review of Subsequent Approvals. By approving the Project <br /> Approvals, City has made a final policy decision that the Project is in the best interests of the <br /> public health, safety and general welfare. Accordingly, City shall not use its authority in <br /> considering any application for a discretionary Subsequent Approval to change the policy <br /> decisions reflected by the Project Approvals or otherwise to prevent or delay development of the <br /> Project as set forth in the Project Approvals. Instead, the Subsequent Approvals shall be deemed <br /> to be tools to implement those final policy decisions. The scope of the review of applications for <br /> Subsequent Approvals shall be limited to a review of substantial conformity with the Vested <br /> Elements and the Applicable Rules (except as otherwise provided by Section 2.4), and <br /> compliance with CEQA. Where such substantial conformity /compliance exists, City shall not <br /> deny an application for a Subsequent Approval for the Project. <br /> 2.6. Development Fees, Exactions; and Conditions. <br /> 2.6.1. General. All fees, exactions, dedications, reservations or other impositions <br /> to which the Project would be subject, but for this Development Agreement, are referred to in <br /> this Development Agreement either as "Processing Fees," (as defined in Section 2.6.2) or <br /> "Impact Fees" (as defined in Section 2.6.3). <br /> 2.6.2. Processing Fees. "Processing Fees" mean fees charged on a citywide basis <br /> to cover the cost of City review of applications for any permit or other review by City <br /> departments. Applications for Subsequent Approvals for the Project shall be charged Processing <br /> Fees to allow City to recover its actual and reasonable costs of processing Developer's <br /> Subsequent Approvals with respect to the Project. <br /> 2.6.3. Impact Fees. "Impact Fees" means monetary fees, exactions or <br /> impositions, other than taxes or assessments, whether established for or imposed upon the <br /> Project individually or as part of a class of projects, that are imposed by City on the Project in <br /> connection with any Project Approval for the Project for any purpose, including, without <br /> limitation, defraying all or a portion of the cost of public services and /or facilities construction, <br /> improvement, operation and maintenance attributable to the burden created by the Project. Any <br /> fee, exaction or imposition imposed on the Project which is not a Processing Fee is an Impact <br /> Fee. No Impact Fees shall be applicable to the Project except as provided in this Development <br /> Agreement. <br /> a. Only the specific Impact Fees listed in Exhibit C shall apply to the <br /> Project. The amount of any Impact Fees applicable to the Project shall be calculated based on <br /> the rate in effect at the time that each application for a building permit is submitted. <br /> b. Any Impact Fees levied against or applied to the Project must be <br /> consistent with the provisions of applicable California law, including the provisions of <br /> 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.