My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Finance Highlights 2011 1202
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Committees
>
Finance Committee
>
Finance Highlights 2011 1202
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/13/2011 6:20:44 PM
Creation date
12/13/2011 6:17:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Committee Highlights
Document Date (6)
12/2/2011
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
_CC Agenda 2011 1219
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2011\Packet 2011 1219
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
191
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Fiscal Year 2009 -10. For Fiscal Year 2009 -10, the City identified a $3.6 million <br />operating deficit in the General Fund, which reflected cost cutting measures administered by the <br />City to reduce its expenditures by 4.9% from the prior fiscal year. Annual revenues received <br />decreased by 0.58% from the prior fiscal year due to the continued economic downturn <br />experienced by the City since 2008. Specifically, decreases in annual revenues received are <br />attributable to a surge in unemployment, which deteriorated the City's labor market, and a <br />concurrent decline in consumer confidence. The decline in consumer confidence is reflected in <br />the City's financial report as property and consumer good sales continue to decrease. <br />Fiscal Year 2010 -11. In Fiscal Year 2010 -11, economic conditions resulted in a slow <br />paced recovery throughout the City, with continued high unemployment, and a weak housing <br />market. Statewide, local governments continued to experience declining revenues. San <br />Leandro's fiscal conditions improved slightly over original projections. The 2010 -11 year -end <br />forecast for the General Fund has improved over the Adopted Budget, largely due to an <br />increase in projected revenues. Revised projections reflected an operating increase of <br />$2,261,000 for the fiscal year. Overall, City Staff project a net fund balance in the General Fund <br />of about $8.8 million at the close of Fiscal Year 2010 -11, an improvement of $7.5 million over <br />Adopted Budget projections. <br />With respect to Fiscal Year 2010 -11 revenues, the City received the following <br />approximate percentages of budgeted revenues in Fiscal Year 2010 -11: <br />General Fund Revenues <br />Actual <br />Budget <br />% of Budget <br />Property Taxes <br />$26,720,790 <br />$26,404,742 <br />1.012% <br />Sales Taxes <br />21,811,494 <br />17,850,000 <br />1.22 <br />Franchise Taxes <br />4,124,846 <br />3,940,000 <br />1.05 <br />Transient Occupancy Taxes <br />351,612 <br />250,000 <br />1.40 <br />Utility Users Taxes <br />9,932,893 <br />9,635,000 <br />1.04 <br />The City currently estimates that Fiscal Year 2010 -11 revenues exceeded expenditures. <br />The future economic conditions of the City remain uncertain, in part due to adverse <br />impacts it continues to face as a result of State action. The State's budget balancing plans have <br />and will continue to harm the City's finances, as it may not receive State funds as previously <br />received and presently anticipated, and the State's efforts to eliminate redevelopment agencies <br />could also have a dramatic impact upon the City's financial circumstances. See "RISK <br />FACTORS — Impact of State Budget on City Revenues ". City Staff continues to monitor State <br />budget developments and the progression of legal challenges to the State's attempted <br />elimination of redevelopment agencies, providing the City Council with updated information <br />regularly <br />Fiscal Year 2011 -12. The City's three largest sources of revenues are property taxes, <br />sales taxes and the utility users taxes. With respect to property taxes, the County has <br />confirmed in writing that the City's Fiscal Year 2010 -11 assessed value is likely to be at least <br />equal to its Fiscal Year 2010 -11 assessed value. Sales taxes are no longer the City's largest <br />source of tax receipts and the City is not certain whether reduced sales tax revenues is part of a <br />short -term (recessionary) trend or a long term trend. <br />The City finished Fiscal Year 2010 -11 with an unreserved, undesignated General Fund <br />balance of approximately $6.0 million. The City anticipates the need to undertake further <br />structural cost reductions in order to maintain a balanced budget in the future. <br />A -10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.