Laserfiche WebLink
In calculating the annual actuarially recommended contribution rates, the PERS actuary <br />calculates on the basis of certain assumptions the actuarial present value of benefits that PERS <br />will fund under the PERS Plans, which includes two components, the normal cost and the <br />unfunded actuarial accrued liability (the "UAAL "). The normal cost represents the actuarial <br />present value of benefits that PERS will fund under the PERS Plans that are attributed to the <br />current year, and the UAAL represents the actuarial present value of benefits that PERS will <br />fund that are attributed to past years. The UAAL represents an estimate of the actuarial shortfall <br />between assets on deposit at PERS and the present value of the benefits that PERS will pay <br />under the PERS Plans to retirees and active employees upon their retirement. The UAAL is <br />based on several assumptions such as, among others, the rate of investment return, average <br />life expectancy, average age of retirement, inflation, salary increases and occurrences of <br />disabilities. In addition, the UAAL includes certain actuarial adjustments such as, among others, <br />the actuarial practice of smoothing losses and gains over multiple years (which is described in <br />more detail below). As a result, the UAAL may be considered an estimate of the unfunded <br />actuarial present value of the benefits that PERS will fund under the PERS Plans to retirees and <br />active employees upon their retirement and not as a fixed expression of the liability the PERS <br />City owe to PERS under their respective PERS Plans. <br />In each actuarial valuation, the PERS actuary estimates the actuarial value of the assets <br />(the "Actuarial Value ") of the PERS Plans at the end of the fiscal year. The PERS actuary <br />assumes, among other things, that the rate of return during that fiscal year, which assumed rate <br />of return is established by PERS and the City has no ability to predict the assumed rate of return <br />from time to time. The PERS actuary uses a smoothing technique to determine Actuarial Value <br />that is calculated based on certain policies. As described below, these policies changed <br />significantly in April 2005, affecting the Actuarial Value calculation for Fiscal Year 2006 -07 and <br />beyond. <br />PERS Actuarial Assumptions and Policies. As a result of the economic downturn in <br />2008 and 2009, PERS experienced a negative investment return of approximately 24% for its <br />fiscal year ended on June 30, 2009. The PERS Board has adopted policies aimed at stabilizing <br />rising employer costs and mitigating the impact of such investment declines. These policies are <br />used to set employer contribution rates for each city. Current policies, as described in Circular <br />Letter #200 - 056 -09 dated August 25, 2009, include, but are not limited to: <br />• Using a 3 -year phase in for Fiscal Year 2008 -09 investment losses and allowing time <br />for the economy to recover. This phased in approach will be achieved by temporarily <br />relaxing the constraints on the smoothed value of assets around the actual market <br />value of assets. This corridor which constrains the smoothed value of assets will be <br />allowed to expand and then contract with the following conditions: <br />1. Increase the corridor limits for the actuarial value of assets <br />from 80 -120% of the market value of 60 -140% of market value <br />on June 30, 2009, which impacts the Fiscal Year 2011 -12 <br />contribution rate. <br />2. Reduce the corridor limits for the actuarial value of assets to <br />70 -130% of market value on June 30, 2010, which impacts the <br />Fiscal Year 2012 -13 contribution rate. <br />10 <br />