My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
3B Public Hearing 2012 0221
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2012
>
Packet 2012 0221
>
3B Public Hearing 2012 0221
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/1/2012 3:27:37 PM
Creation date
2/15/2012 5:50:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Staff Report
Document Date (6)
2/21/2012
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
_CC Agenda 2012 0221 CD+RG
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2012\Packet 2012 0221
8D Consent 2012 0305
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2012\Packet 2012 0305
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
94
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
EXCERPT OF THE DRAFT MINUTES FOR PLANNING COMMISSION <br />SPECIAL MEETING, JANUARY 26, 2012 <br />Item 8A: Miscellaneous <br />Modification of staff recommendation regarding amendments to the City's Zoning Code related <br />to miscellaneous changes to the IL, IG and IP Zoning Districts related to Commercial Recreation <br />and Entertainment Activities. (Livermore) <br />Senior Planner Livermore stated that at its meeting of December 15, 2011, the Planning <br />Commission objected to portions of the staff proposal that would have: <br />1) Excluded Commercial Recreation and Entertainment Activities as Conditionally Permitted <br />Uses in Industrial Districts IG, IL and IP, and <br />2) Added Assembly Use as a Conditionally Permitted Use in Commercial District DA -5. <br />Therefore, she noted, staff has revised the earlier proposal to leave the DA -5 District out of the <br />group of Commercial Districts for which staff had proposed adding Assembly Use as a <br />Conditionally Permitted Use while adding, Assembly Uses as Conditionally Permitted Uses in <br />NA -2 and SA -2 Districts and Cultural Institutions to DA -3 as a Conditionally Permitted Use for <br />City Council consideration. <br />As for revisions to the proposals regarding the Industrial Districts, Senior Planner Livermore, <br />referring to a PowerPoint slide, noted that the proposal she presented at the December 15, 2011 <br />meeting would have removed Commercial Recreation and Entertainment Activities as <br />Conditionally Permitted Uses in Industrial Districts IG, IL and IP. <br />In pursuing the Planning Commission's request for a more nuanced approach to this issue, she <br />noted that staff examined zoning designations already on the map [i.e., IL (AU), IG (AU) and IP <br />(AU), and added proposed language to those designations that explicitly spells out which uses <br />would be 1) permitted, 2) conditionally permitted, 3) subject to administrative review, and <br />4) temporary uses subject to administrative review. <br />As a result of this change, she concluded that Commercial Recreation, Entertainment Activities <br />and Assembly Uses are among the Conditionally Permitted Uses listed in the revised language for <br />the IL,(AU), IG(AU) and IP(AU). These uses would not be allowed in the Industrial Districts <br />without the AU designation she noted. <br />Senior Planner Livermore explained that the revised proposal would continue to preserve the <br />integrity of the City's industrial areas for industrial uses, while conditionally permitting those <br />Commercial Recreation and Entertainment Activities — and Assembly Uses — in the AU Zoning <br />District that are both appropriate and compatible. Referring to a map showing San Leandro's <br />Industrial Districts, Senior Planner Livermore indicated that the AU Zoning Districts contain a <br />total of 115 properties representing 12931 acres. In response to a question from Commissioner <br />Rennie, Senior Planner Livermore said that many of these properties are along the Washington <br />Avenue and San Leandro Boulevard corridors. <br />Senior Planner Livermore also explained that because the revised proposal is less restrictive <br />than what staff proposed at the December 15, 2011 Planning Commission meeting, this item was <br />not noticed as a public hearing, but rather put on the agenda for this special meeting. <br />Furthermore, no additional environmental review is required because the changes represent less <br />impact than the original proposal she noted. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.