My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
3B Public Hearing 2012 0221
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2012
>
Packet 2012 0221
>
3B Public Hearing 2012 0221
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/1/2012 3:27:37 PM
Creation date
2/15/2012 5:50:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Staff Report
Document Date (6)
2/21/2012
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
_CC Agenda 2012 0221 CD+RG
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2012\Packet 2012 0221
8D Consent 2012 0305
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2012\Packet 2012 0305
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
94
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DA -3 and DA -4 Districts. The DA -5 District did not include Assembly Uses as a conditionally <br />permitted use. Staff now recommends the NA -2, SA -2 and DA -5 districts, which specifically <br />contemplate residential uses, have Assembly Uses added as a conditionally permitted use. This <br />change would improve the overall land use compatibility within the residential and commercial <br />districts identified. <br />The North Area 2 District is located on East 14 Street from Georgia Way to the northern City <br />border. The South Area 2 District is located on East 14 Street from Sybil Avenue to 136 <br />Avenue. The Downtown Area 5 District is located on Alvarado and Martinez Streets between <br />West Estudillo and West Juana Avenues. Please see the attached map to see these various <br />zoning districts. <br />The 1999 -2002 General Plan Update represented another extensive community engagement <br />process with a 52 member General Plan Advisory Committee advising the Planning Commission <br />and City Council on the General Plan Update. As part of this process, the core values of the <br />industrial districts as a major industrial, technology and office employment center were <br />established. One example in the General Plan is Goal 7: Industrial and Office Districts. Goal 7 <br />states: Continue to develop a strong and healthy industrial and office employment base in the <br />community. Policy 7.03 of the General Plan states the following: TECH - SECTOR <br />RECRUITMENT. Attract and retain technology ( "high tech') companies by improving <br />technology infrastructure, targeting such companies through marketing, supporting incubator <br />and start up firms, and maintaining development regulations which facilitate the adaptive reuse <br />of older industrial buildings. Also, Policy 10.04 states the following: INDUSTRIAL <br />SANCTUARY: Protect the City's major industrial areas from encroachment by uses that are <br />potentially incompatible with existing viable industrial activities, or which may inhibit the ability <br />of industry to operate effectively. These General Plan goals and policies speak to the importance <br />of the industrial area as a sanctuary for high quality employment. <br />The Board of Zoning Adjustments raised some very valid issues in their discussion on November <br />3, 2011 as to how best to approach land uses in industrial districts. We note that from a planning <br />perspective various communities have taken different approaches and in this regard the planning <br />experts have varying approaches to job retention and job generation, depending on the size of the <br />city and values in that community. In the Fremont example, presented during the Board of <br />Zoning Adjustments discussion, it is worth noting that Fremont is a city of some 91 square miles. <br />The extensive commercial and industrial zoning districts within the City of Fremont offer <br />opportunities of much greater proportions than those in San Leandro, with an area of 15 square <br />miles. Fremont has 4,136 acres designated for industrial uses while San Leandro has 1,800 acres <br />of land designated for industrial uses. Therefore, different cities do legitimately pursue different <br />approaches. The identification in the San Leandro General Plan of the industrial area as a major <br />employment center of the City and the region is still a valued goal of the City of San Leandro. <br />Maintaining industrial areas for this type of industrial employment can help achieve this <br />important San Leandro goal. San Leandro continues to pursue attraction and retention of new <br />economy businesses, including high tech industrial uses. <br />Staff is recommending that Commercial Recreation and Entertainment Activities be removed as <br />a Conditionally Permitted Use from the Commercial Districts to retain the industrial and <br />employment base that the industrial districts represent. The short term gains of employment with <br />commercial recreation or entertainment activities conflict with the long term goals of stable <br />Planning Commission Staff Report December 15, 2011 <br />Proposed Zoning Code Changes Page 3 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.