3B Public Hearing 2012 0221 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a. Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? Comment The proposed ordinance will not result in any new construction or physical improvements that could result in any biological impacts. Potentially b. Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive El Significant El 2 natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations Potentially Unless Less than or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Significant Mitigation Significant Service? Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact b. Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? Comment The proposed ordinance will not result in any new construction El El El 2 or physical improvements that could result in any air quality impacts. Any projects built pursuant to these code changes would be subject to their own, new independent environmental review. These changes do not encourage development. c. Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant ❑ ❑ ❑ 2 for which the project region is non - attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? Comment The proposed ordinance will not result in any new construction or physical improvements that could result in any air quality impacts. Any projects built pursuant to these code changes would be subject to their own, new independent environmental review. These changes do not encourage development. d. Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? El El Comment The proposed ordinance will not result in any new construction or physical improvements that could result in any air quality impacts. Any projects built pursuant to these code changes would be subject to their own, new independent environmental review. These changes do not encourage development. e. Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? El El Comment The proposed ordinance will not result in any new construction or physical improvements that could result in any air quality impacts. Any projects built pursuant to these code changes would be subject to their own, new independent environmental review. These changes do not encourage development. IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a. Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? Comment The proposed ordinance will not result in any new construction or physical improvements that could result in any biological impacts. b. Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive El El El 2 natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? Comment The proposed ordinance will not result in any new construction or physical improvements that could result in any biological impacts. c. Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as El El El 2 defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? Comment The proposed ordinance will not result in any new construction or physical improvements that could result in any biological impacts. Any projects built pursuant to these code changes would be subject to their own, new independent environmental review. These changes do not encourage development.