3B Public Hearing 2012 0221 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES. a. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated El Potentially El 2 with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need Significant for new or physically altered government facilities, the construction of Potentially Unless Less than which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain Significant Mitigation Significant acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact c. Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? ❑ ❑ ❑ 2 Comment The proposed ordinance will not result in any new construction El El El 2 or physical improvements that could result in any impacts to population and El El El 2 housing. El El El 2 XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES. a. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated El El El 2 with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered government facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? ❑ ❑ ❑ 2 Police protection? El El El 2 Schools? El El El 2 Parks? El El El 2 Other public facilities? El El El 2 Comment The proposed ordinance will not result in any new construction or physical improvements that could result in any impacts to public services. XIV. RECREATION. a. Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional El El El 2 parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? (5, 34), Comment The proposed ordinance will not result in any new construction or physical improvements that could result in any impacts to recreational facilities. b. Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or El El El 2 expansion of recreational facilities that might have an adverse physical El effect on the environment? (1) Comment The proposed ordinance will not result in any new construction or physical improvements that could result in any impacts to recreational facilities. XV. TRANS PORTATION /TRAFFIC. Would the project: a. Cause an increase in traffic that is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? Comment Any projects built pursuant to these code changes would be subject to their own, new independent environmental review. These changes do not encourage development. b. Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard El established in the Growth Limitation Plan, the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? Comment Any projects built pursuant to these code changes would be subject to their own, new independent environmental review. These changes do not encourage development. 10