Laserfiche WebLink
File Number: 12 -037 <br />Design; 3) Fencing; and 4) Color. Three basic design concepts were initially developed for <br />the interchanges. <br />The aesthetic improvements will be constructed using Federal Transportation Enhancement <br />funds. The Alameda CTC is the lead agency on the design phase of project. The Alameda <br />CTC will turn the project over to Caltrans for the construction phase. The Alameda CTC and <br />Caltrans have requested that the City forward a resolution indicating the City's aesthetic <br />preferences. <br />Analysis <br />City staff reviewed the initial aesthetic alternatives and displayed them at the September 13, <br />2011 Facilities and Transportation Committee meeting to receive initial input. Using the <br />Committee's input, the historical experience of the Public Works Services staff on <br />maintenance risks for the various alternatives, and the Planning Department's architectural <br />experience, a reduced set of design options was prepared. This review process eliminated <br />the colored concrete and the cherry and butterfly figures on the bridge fencing. The colored <br />concrete was eliminated because it would make the City responsible for graffiti removal for all <br />of the bridge surfaces rather than just the surfaces above the roadway. The cherry and <br />butterfly figures were eliminated from the fencing to reduce vandalism and to lower the cost <br />and complexity of future fence repair. This reduced set of alternatives was used for the <br />outreach efforts to seek public input. Attachments 1 A and 1 B show this set of aesthetic <br />alternatives. <br />In -lieu of holding a traditional meeting for community feedback, staff displayed the proposed <br />aesthetic design alternatives at the San Leandro Farmers' Market on September 28, 2011 <br />from 4:00 to 8:00 p.m. at the City Information Booth. The informal setting of the Farmers' <br />Market was selected to encourage residents to provide feedback on the features and to allow <br />staff the opportunity to engage the public and receive broader input. The alternatives were <br />also displayed at the District 5 and 6 Town Hall meeting held on October 6, 2011 at the Main <br />Library. A comment form was made available to provide written input and allow for the <br />tabulating of comments. Approximately 70 comment forms were received during the two <br />events. Results favored the green fencing alternative and provided positive feedback on the <br />corbel and slope paving designs. <br />Based upon input from the public and staff, the preferred aesthetic features include the <br />following: <br />• End Corbel: Hill design with City Logo <br />• Slope Paving: Butterfly pattern at Marina; Cherry pattern at Davis Street - concrete <br />finish <br />• Fencing: Hills pattern <br />• Fencing & Lighting Color: Green <br />• Wall Finish: Fractured Rib <br />These proposed aesthetic features were then brought before the Facilities and Transportation <br />Committee for review. The Committee concurred with the features and directed staff to bring <br />them before the full City Council for review and approval. Attachments 2A and 2B show the <br />proposed aesthetic features to be forwarded to City Council for its endorsement and approval <br />City of San Leandro Page 2 Printed on 211512012 <br />