Laserfiche WebLink
Excerpts of the Board of Zoning Adjustments Regular Meeting Minutes January 5, 2012 <br />Page 7 of 7 <br />Member Makin said that Mr. McKinney referred to the CUP document in his packet during the <br />September 1, 2011 meeting, so clearly he knew what he was agreeing to. <br />Member Palma said that at first the situation appeared pretty black- and - white. She said she's <br />still not clear what happened and why on the night of September 30, 2011. She also said that the <br />conditions of approval spell out clearly that the permitted use is to operate a trailer rental and <br />sales business, and any change deemed minor could be approved by the Community <br />Development Director. If Mr. McKinney wanted something else, she said, he could have come to <br />the City or petitioned the Director to ask whether he could make extra money by renting out the <br />space. Member Palma also said she did not understand Mr. Dillman's claim that business owners <br />have an inherent right to hold other kinds of events at their facilities. She noted that Mr. <br />McKinney's landlord himself would not have approved such a request. Member Palma said that <br />she doesn't want to discourage small business owners, adding that it would really be a shame for <br />other business people to suffer any repercussions as a result of this situation. She said it's a hard <br />lesson to learn about how not to do business, but it's clear what should and should not have <br />happened. <br />Member Mendieta said that it's clear a violation of the CUP occurred, and that his heart sank <br />when he heard about the tragedy that resulted. He said that he certainly understands that Mr. <br />McKinney never intended anything bad to happen, but things got out of control. He said that as <br />Planner Penaranda had pointed out, the facility was not even equipped to accommodate the <br />volume of people in the first place, and when more people than expected showed up, it should <br />have been canceled. Mr. Dillman, in contrast to Mr. McKinney, Member Mendieta stated, has a <br />CUP that allows him to hold public events at his place of business. At Mr. McKinney's place, it <br />was an unauthorized activity that had tragic consequences. <br />Acting Chair Houston said that the BZA covered the very specific uses of the facility in the <br />September 1, 2011 meeting, with many questions, including questions about the hours of <br />operation. Mr. McKinney had indicated then that the business would be pretty much a 9 -to -5 <br />type situation, with customers coming in by appointment only. On occasions, he had stated that a <br />customer might come in earlier or later, but not before 7:30 a.m. or after 7:30 p.m. Acting Chair <br />Houston also stated that after examining all of the materials, she found no references to any <br />public or community events. She said that this is a difficult situation, involving a good, well - <br />liked tenant and a tragic loss of life. <br />Motion to accept staff recommendation to revoke CUP PLN2011 -00021 <br />Makin /Palma: 6 Aye, 0 No, 1 Recused (Daly) <br />Secretary Barros said that decisions of the BZA are final unless appealed to the City Council, <br />and appeals may be filed with the City Clerk's office within 15 days of the BZA decision. <br />