Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes April 19, 2012 <br />Page 3 of 13 <br />He said the project proposed represents a significant part of the City's current revitalization <br />strategy, which also includes the Kaiser development, OSIsoft's campus expansion in the San <br />Leandro Crossings project, and the Lit San Leandro efforts to attract technology businesses. He <br />said the developer's $11 million investment could produce $100,000 -plus annually in sales tax <br />and 113 jobs as well as property tax revenue. <br />The proposal represents an effort to balance the importance of bringing in a high - quality project <br />that respects community input with a particular interest in tenant mix, while allowing enough <br />flexibility to ensure the project's financial viability and ability to meet retailer needs. <br />Mr. Millenbah said staff recommends Planning Commission approval of 1) Planned District <br />(PD) rezoning; 2) a Planned Development Permit; and 3) categorical exemption from CEQA, <br />pursuant to Public Resources Code Sections 21083 -21084 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15332. <br />PD Rezoning Mr. Millenbah explained that the project is currently zoned DA -1(S). Planned <br />District rezoning would allow for standards tailored to the specific circumstances of the property <br />and provide flexibility for future uses. Because the site is in the midst of a transit area, keeping <br />the interpretations of future uses open is important, Mr. Millenbah said. That flexibility means <br />that residential units eventually could be added to the site. <br />Planned Development Permit Relative to the permit granting the right to build this project <br />subject to its conditions of approval, Mr. Millenbah said the Planning Commission should review <br />the Planned Development Permit in the context of guidelines such as the Downtown Plan and <br />Urban Design Guidelines and the Downtown San Leandro Transit Oriented Development (TOD) <br />Strategy. Other considerations include site planning, traffic circulation and pedestrian access. <br />CEQA Exemption Staff reports that this project should be exempt from CEQA as a Class 32 <br />infill exemption consistent with the City's General Plan and occupying a site of less than five <br />acres. Furthermore, because the site is within the TOD Strategy area, in 2007 it was subject to an <br />approved Environmental Impact Report. That EIR was premised on a greater- intensity <br />development than what's proposed now. <br />Referring to the Recommended Conditions of Approval, Commissioner Dlugosh asked about <br />two items related to residential development that are listed in the Building and Safety Services <br />section, as well as the special inspector. Mr. Millenbah indicated that the items noted will be <br />deleted because they aren't applicable. He explained that the Building Department opted to <br />include the special inspector language to enable calling in these outside inspectors if needed. <br />Until the new parking garage is completed, Commissioner Dlugosh asked whether the City has <br />made provisions to accommodate the Wednesday Farmers' Market parking overflow. Mr. Sims <br />said the timing of this project is such that parking will remain available for as much as 75% of the <br />Farmers' Market season. After that, Farmers' Market patrons will have to park elsewhere. <br />Commissioner Dlugosh asked whether any studies have been undertaken to address that issue, <br />because the Farmers' Market is important enough to the community to close off Parrott Street one <br />night a week. Noting that even after the new parking garage opens, people might not want to walk <br />all the way from Callan and Estudillo Avenues to Parrott Street, he said it seems the City would <br />make plans to facilitate parking. Mr. Sims acknowledged that there isno solution for the problem <br />yet, but recognized the concern. <br />Commissioner Fitzsimons said as he understands it, "special inspector" is a fairly specific term <br />that relates to structural work, particularly welding. Developers hire special inspectors to sign off <br />on all such work, confirming that it's been completed according to the Building Code. City staff <br />is always a third party in such circumstances. Mr. Millenbah said that the City's structural <br />engineer puts that condition in to reserve the right to bring in a special inspector at its discretion. <br />