My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
10B Action 2012 0702
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2012
>
Packet 2012 0702
>
10B Action 2012 0702
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/26/2012 6:21:14 PM
Creation date
6/26/2012 6:11:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Staff Report
Document Date (6)
7/2/2012
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
_CC Agenda 2012 0702 RG
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2012\Packet 2012 0702
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
428
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
QUESTION <br />4. Does approval of such an ordinance open the jurisdictions themselves to civil or <br />criminal liability? <br />ANSWER <br />4. Approving an ordinance authorizing or regulating marijuana dispensaries may <br />subject the jurisdictions to civil or criminal liability. <br />ANALYSIS <br />Under federal law, criminal liability is created solely by statute. (Dowling v. United States <br />(1985) 473 U.S. 207, 213.) Although becoming more rare, municipalities have been, and still <br />may be, criminally prosecuted for violations of federal law, where the federal law provides not <br />just a penalty for imprisonment, but a penalty for monetary sanctions. (See Green, Stuart P., The <br />Criminal Prosecution ofLocal Governments, 72 N.C. L. Rev. 1197 (1994) (discussion of history <br />of municipal criminal prosecution).) <br />The CSA prohibits persons from engaging in certain acts, including the distribution and <br />possession of Schedule I substances, of which marijuana is one. (21 U.S.C. sec. 841.) A person, <br />for purposes of the CSA, includes "any individual, corporation, government or governmental <br />subdivision or agency, business trust, partnership, association, or other legal entity." (21 C.F.R. <br />sec. 1300.01 (34). See also 21 C.F.R. sec. 1301.02 ( "Any term used in this part shall have the <br />definition set forth in section 102 of the Act (21 U. S.C. 802) or part 1300 of this chapter.").) By <br />its very terms, then, the CSA may be violated by a local public entity. If the actions of a local <br />public entity otherwise satisfy the requirements of aiding and abetting a violation of the CSA, as <br />discussed above, then local public entities may, indeed, be subject to criminal prosecution for a <br />violation of federal law. <br />Under either federal or state law, local public entities would not be subject to civil liability for <br />the mere adoption of an ordinance, a legislative act. As discussed above, local legislators are <br />absolutely immune from civil liability for legislative acts under both federal and state law. In <br />addition, there is specific immunity under state law relating to any issuance or denial of permits. <br />QUESTION <br />5. Does the issuance of a business license to a marijuana dispensary involve any <br />additional civil or criminal liability for a city or county and its elected governing <br />body? <br />ANSWER <br />5. Local public entities will likely not be liable for the issuance of business licenses <br />to marijuana dispensaries that plan to dispense crude marijuana as medicine. <br />© 2009 California Police Chiefs Assn. 38 All Rights Reserved <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.