My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
10D Action 2012 0716
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2012
>
Packet 2012 0716
>
10D Action 2012 0716
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/24/2012 4:11:32 PM
Creation date
7/11/2012 11:49:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Staff Report
Document Date (6)
7/16/2012
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
_CC Agenda 2012 0716 CS+RG
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2012\Packet 2012 0716
Reso 2012-096
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2012
SA Reso 2012-010
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
To: Memo to Successor Agency Clients <br />From: Susan E. Bloch <br />Re: AB 1484— Redevelopment Budget Trailer Bill <br />Date: July 5, 2012 <br />Page: 12 <br />establish any other agreements in furtherance of enforceable obligations with the <br />Sponsoring Jurisdiction are invalid until they are included on an approved ROPS." <br />Thus, the status of amended and restated cooperative agreements and funding <br />agreements executed in reliance upon Section 34178(a) (authorizing re -entry into <br />agreements with Oversight Board approval) is in question. <br />Affiliated Entities. AB 1484 expands the definition of "city, county or city and <br />county" to include other public entities and organizations that are controlled by the <br />Sponsoring Jurisdiction. This would enable the State Controller to unwind transfers <br />to such entities pursuant to the "clawback" provisions of the statute . As noted <br />above, this change in definition also causes agreements between redevelopment <br />agencies and entities controlled by their Sponsoring Jurisdiction to be excluded from <br />the definition of enforceable obligation in the context of the Due Diligence Reviews. <br />6. Additional Clawback Provisions In addition to the ABxl 26 clawback provision <br />directing the State Controller to unwind transfers that took place between <br />redevelopment agencies and public entities after January 1, 2011 unless subject to <br />contractual third -party commitments, AB 1484 includes additional clawback <br />provisions. One directs the State Controller to unwind transfers that Successor <br />Agencies undertook if not pursuant to an enforceable obligation on an approved <br />ROPS . A second provision states that Successor Agencies lack authority to, and <br />shall not, transfer any powers or revenues to any public or private party except <br />pursuant to an enforceable obligation on an approved ROPS, declares such transfers <br />to be void, directs the Successor Agency to reverse such transfers, and provides that <br />the State Controller may review and order the return of revenues or other items of <br />value . 57 <br />7. Bond Proceeds, Contractual Obligations As described above, AB 1484 contains <br />language permitting Successor Agencies to spend the proceeds of pre -2011 bonds <br />under certain circumstances following issuance of a Finding of Completion, but <br />similar authority is not provided for bonds issued after January 1, 2011. The statute <br />still provides that "bond proceeds shall be used for the purposes for which the bonds <br />ss Section 34180(h). <br />54 Section 34167.10. <br />ss See Section 34167.5. <br />56 Sections 34167.5, 34178.8. <br />51 Section 34177.3(c). <br />A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION OAKLAND LOS ANGELES SACRAMENTO SAN FRANCISCO SANTA ROSA FRESNO <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.