Laserfiche WebLink
File Number: 12 -343 <br />cooperatives. <br />(N) Marijuana remains an illegal substance under the Federal Controlled Substances Act, <br />21 U.S.C. § 801, et seq. and is classified as a "Schedule I Drug," which is defined as a drug or <br />other substance that has a high potential for abuse, that has no currently accepted medical <br />use in treatment in the United States, and that has not been accepted as safe for its use <br />under medical supervision. Furthermore, the Federal Controlled Substances Act makes it <br />unlawful for any person to cultivate, manufacture, distribute or dispense, or possess with <br />intent to manufacture, distribute or dispense marijuana. The Controlled Substances Act <br />contains no statutory exemption for the possession of marijuana for medical purposes. <br />(0) The City Council, in adopting this Ordinance, takes legislative notice of the following <br />federal cases: <br />(1) United States v. Oakland Cannabis Buyers' Cooperative (2001), 532 U.S. 483 <br />[finding that there is no medical necessity defense or exemption for the possession of <br />medical marijuana under the federal Controlled Substances Act]; <br />(2) Gonzalez v. Raich ( 2005), 545 U.S. 1 [holding that under the Commerce Clause <br />of the U.S. Constitution, Congress can prohibit the manufacture, cultivation, distribution <br />and possession of marijuana pursuant to the Federal Controlled Substances Act, even <br />as such prohibitions apply to marijuana manufactured, cultivated, distributed or <br />possessed under the auspices of the Act]; and <br />(3) James v. City of Costa Mesa et al. (Case No. SACV 10 -402 AG (MLGx)) [District <br />Court ruling denying plaintiffs' preliminary injunction and finding that medical marijuana <br />users are not qualified individuals under the Americans with Disabilities Act because <br />marijuana remains an illegal drug under the Federal Controlled Substances Act]. <br />(P) The City Council, in adopting this Ordinance, takes further legislative notice of the <br />existence and content of the following reports concerning the negative secondary effects and <br />adverse impacts of facilities dispensing medical marijuana: September 2009, "California <br />Police Chiefs Association Position Paper on Decriminalizing Marijuana "; "Medical Marijuana <br />Dispensaries and Associated Issues" presented to the California Police Chiefs Association, <br />April to June 2010; "Medical Marijuana Dispensaries and Associated Issues" presented to the <br />California Police Chiefs Association, January to March 2010; "Medical Marijuana Dispensaries <br />and Associated Issues" presented to the California Police Chiefs Association, July to <br />September 2008; "Medical Marijuana Dispensaries and Associated Issues" presented to the <br />California Police Chiefs Association, April to June 2009; "Medical Marijuana Dispensaries and <br />Associated Issues" presented to the California Police Chiefs Association, January to March <br />2009; "Medical Marijuana Dispensaries and Associated Issues" presented to the California <br />Police Chiefs Association, September to December 2007; "Medical Marijuana Dispensaries <br />and Associated Issues" presented to the California Police Chiefs Association, October to <br />December 2009 "Medical Marijuana Dispensaries and Associated Issues" presented to the <br />California Police Chiefs Association [undated]. These reports are available at the City's <br />Community Development Department, noted as Exhibit B). <br />(Q) In adopting this Ordinance, the City Council also takes notice of the existence and <br />contents of various newspaper articles concerning negative secondary effects and adverse <br />City of San Leandro Page 5 Printed on 711012012 <br />