Laserfiche WebLink
• <br /> Qualification Statement <br /> New City America has been the only company in the state to be creative in the formation of <br /> special assessment districts, based upon the provision of Prop 218 of the State Constitution. <br /> San Leandro has a tremendous advantage in being a charter city. Your RFP mentions that many <br /> residential units could be included in the potential district, and I am sure many tax exempt <br /> properties would be included in the new PBID or CBD. We would strongly advise that you NOT <br /> use the Streets and Highway Code PBID law due to some fundamental flaws in the law. Those <br /> flaws include the following: <br /> 1. Your district will include many different land uses, however the PBID law is called the <br /> "Business Improvement District" Act of 1994. This makes many tax'exempt, social service, <br /> residential and other land uses wonder why they would be paying into a special benefit district <br /> that is established to promote "business improvement ". Business improvement is a key <br /> component of the district, but not the only component of the district. <br /> 2. The PBID law has a maximum first year term of 5 years. That amount of time is hardly <br /> long enough to make an impact in the district. CBDs can be formed for as long a property <br /> owners think is necessary to start the "re- invention" process of the district. <br /> 3. The petition triggers the balloting for the district formation. The petition does NOT <br /> create the district, the balloting does. However, the petition threshold is higher than the vote <br /> needed to establish the district. This is backwards and the extremely high petition threshold <br /> prevents many districts from ever being formed. The CBD ordinance could make the petition <br /> threshold more reasonable and allow property owners to get to the balloting phase quicker. <br /> 4. The PBID law, NOT the state constitution, allows for exemption of tax exempt parcels, even <br /> though they will be receiving benefit. The CBD ordinance would have no such clause and would <br /> be consistent with Prop 218 in that it would allow for ALL parcels to be assessed as long as they <br /> were receiving benefit. The relevant clause in the PBID law is as follows: <br /> 36622. The management district plan shall contain all of the following: <br /> (k) A list of the properties or businesses to be assessed, including the assessor's parcel <br /> numbers for properties to be assessed, and a statement of the method or methods by <br /> which the expenses of a district will be imposed upon benefited real property or businesses, in <br /> proportion to the benefit received by the property or business, to defray the cost thereof, <br /> including operation and maintenance. The plan may provide that all or any class or category <br /> ol'real property which is exempt by law from real property taxation may nevertheless he <br /> included within the boundaries of the district but slur /l not he subject to assessment on real <br /> property. <br /> 5. Furthermore, residentially zoned parcels, even if found within, a commercial area, are <br /> specifically exempt from paying into the assessment district. The CBD ordinance would have no <br /> 4 <br />