Laserfiche WebLink
San Leandro Commercial Broadband Strategy <br />6. Comprehensive Open Trench Policy <br />6.1. Background <br />Most of the cost of building utilities, including fiber optic lines, in urban areas is related <br />to cutting open streets, placing conduit and repairing the damage done. If projects can <br />be combined, then costs can be shared, damage and disruption minimized and timely <br />deployment can be encouraged. <br />So- called open trench policies are designed to maximize this opportunity by creating a <br />consistent and reliable procedure for sharing advance information about street cuts and <br />facilitating cooperation between public works projects, utility companies of all kinds <br />and both incumbent and competitive telecommunication service providers. <br />The intended result is to install telecommunications conduit at a greatly reduced cost <br />and minimize future digs by providing an opportunity to inexpensively install facilities <br />on a cooperative basis. Most of the expense involved in installing underground fiber <br />optic lines is for digging into roadways and repairing the subsequent damage, so <br />opportunities such as these could save money and speed construction. <br />For example, if a telecommunications company was notified that a water district was <br />digging a trench on a particular route and given an opportunity to place conduit in that <br />trench on a predetermined cost - sharing basis, it might accelerate plans to extend high <br />speed Internet service to that area. <br />Other open trench policies go further, mandating the installation of empty conduit on a <br />prospective basis any time a street is opened. Ownership of the new, empty conduit is <br />typically in the hands of the public agency that controls the right of way. <br />As with broadband facility reviews, adding open trench notification procedures to City <br />approval processes has the potential to increase project compliance costs. However, a <br />slight increase in cost for an initial applicant would be offset by any subsequent cost <br />sharing arrangements, and by the significant decrease in cost for potential partners. <br />Taken as a whole, costs should decrease for everyone because over time any given <br />company would realize more cost sharing opportunities than be subject to notification <br />requirements. <br />6.2. Current status <br />San Leandro does not have a formal open trench policy, as recommended by Governor <br />Schwarzenegger's executive order and the California Broadband Task Force's 2008 <br />16 July 2012 TellusVenture Associates Page 28 <br />