My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Reso 2012-108
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Resolutions
>
2012
>
Reso 2012-108
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/27/2012 9:48:33 AM
Creation date
9/27/2012 9:48:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Resolution
Document Date (6)
9/17/2012
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
10C Action 2012 0917 v2
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2012\Packet 2012 0917
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
IN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LEANDRO <br /> RESOLUTION NO. 2012-108 <br /> RESOLUTION OPPOSING PROPOSITION 32 ON THE NOVEMBER 2012 BALLOT <br /> WHEREAS, thousands of San Leandrans and 2.5 million workers throughout California <br /> are represented by a labor union, and San Leandro is the home to several union training facilities <br /> and administrative offices; and <br /> WHEREAS, unions represent employees in the collective bargaining process, by which <br /> they negotiate terms and conditions of employment with employers; and <br /> WHEREAS, unions pay for their activities with money raised from dues charged to union <br /> members. In many cases, employers automatically deduct these dues and fees from their <br /> employees' paychecks and transfer the money to the unions; and <br /> WHEREAS, many unions use some of the funds that they receive from payroll <br /> deductions to support activities not directly related to the collective bargaining process. These <br /> expenditures may include contributions to candidates seeking public office as well as spending to <br /> communicate political views to union members; and <br /> WHEREAS, Proposition 32, the "Political Contributions by Payroll Deduction, <br /> Contributions to Candidates, Initiative Statute," prohibits unions from using payroll- deducted <br /> funds for political purposes and applies the same prohibition to corporations; and <br /> WHEREAS, other than unions, very few organizations use payroll deductions to finance <br /> political spending in California; and <br /> WHEREAS, Proposition 32 also prohibits unions and corporations from contributing to <br /> candidates and candidate- controlled committees. However, current law does not limit the <br /> amount of money that individuals, groups, and businesses may spend in political campaigns <br /> through independent expenditure committees. Proposition 32 places no restriction on donations <br /> from sources other than payroll deductions to independent expenditure committees; and <br /> WHEREAS, the California Labor Federation states that Proposition 32 "would severely <br /> restrict union members in both the public and private sector from having a voice in our political <br /> process;" and <br /> WHEREAS, non - partisan groups like the California League of Women Voters, California <br /> Common Cause, and Public Citizen have urged voters to reject Proposition 32; and <br /> WHEREAS, Public Citizen states that Proposition 32 is "a partisan attack against <br /> organized labor," observing that "corporations do not take deductions from paychecks to finance <br /> their political activity. Instead, corporations dip directly into the corporate till for their political <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.