My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
10D Action 2013 0219
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2013
>
Packet 2013 0219
>
10D Action 2013 0219
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/25/2013 1:04:12 PM
Creation date
2/13/2013 4:00:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Staff Report
Document Date (6)
2/19/2013
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
_CC Agenda 2013 0219 CS+RG
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2013\Packet 2013 0219
MO 2013-008
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Minute Orders\2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Download electronic document
View images
View plain text
City Council Priority Setting Workshop <br />Attachment B – Summary of Workshop Evaluation Comments Management Partners <br /> <br /> <br />11 <br />Attachment B – Summary of Workshop Evaluation Comments <br />This is a consolidation of the comments provided by workshop participants. <br /> <br />The best thing about this workshop was... <br />• Decorum, well organized, like a good paint job the prep makes a difference. <br />• Organized well, good prep…good public participation and report. <br />• That you kept it moving forward. <br />• We had a facilitator. <br />• Being able to speak freely without too much structure regarding our focuses. <br />• Stayed on time. Good public comment options. <br />• Focused and stayed on schedule, actually under schedule. Linda was great! <br />• Well organized, focused and result oriented. <br />• In depth discussion of action steps/brainstorming objectives for council goals. <br />• The organization and pre‐work. <br />• Stayed on time! Good public comment options. <br /> <br />Some thing(s) which could have been better... <br />• This was very good today. <br />• Department heads should have been engaged in the discussion. <br />• Too much of a wish list without knowing they would only get one dot to vote. <br />• We need to get all the materials and staff reports a few days before. <br />• I think we should have been able to walk away with the goals done instead of them <br />being in an incomplete status. <br />• We should spend time discussing the city’s overarching and pressing needs in <br />conjunction with setting goals. <br />• I think the goals were diluted by putting very similar objectives as separate objectives so <br />there is not really clear action on some goals. <br /> <br />Overall usefulness of the workshop: <br /> <br />1 (0 responses) 2 (0 responses) 3 (1 response) 4 (5 responses) 5 (5 responses) <br />Not Useful Very Useful <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.