My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2C Presentation 2013 0304
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2013
>
Packet 2013 0304
>
2C Presentation 2013 0304
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/27/2013 11:07:11 AM
Creation date
2/27/2013 11:05:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Staff Report
Document Date (6)
3/4/2013
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
_CC Agenda 2013 0304 CS+RG
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2013\Packet 2013 0304
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
116
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Download electronic document
View images
View plain text
Appendices <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Page B-17 <br />Overall Support for Greenhouse Gas Reduction: <br /> <br />Overall, ninety-six percent of those surveyed say that they would support city-led efforts to meet <br />mandated greenhouse gas emissions targets. Forty-six percent of respondents support <br />voluntary measures only, while thirty-two percent support the idea of city-mandated <br />requirements. Only sixteen percent of those surveyed would support mandatory requirements <br />and increased taxes. Business owners are the group least supportive of mandatory <br />requirements and increased taxes; only one business owner surveyed voiced support for <br />increased taxes. Despite general support for city-led efforts, most of the comments made were <br />negative, which may suggest that opponents of mandatory requirements and increased taxes <br />feel more strongly than supporters. ―No new taxes!‖ writes one resident, a sentiment echoed by <br />many respondents. Others expressed doubt over the effectiveness of the city‘s plans to reduce <br />greenhouse gas emissions. One resident says he or she would support the city ―if the city <br />actually had anything effective in mind.‖ Another resident thinks the city‘s goals were not <br />ambitious enough, questioning, ―Why is San Leandro only looking to reduce 25% below 2005 <br />emissions vs. 1990 levels?‖ Residents also raised questions about the city‘s efforts to reduce <br />emissions. ―What happens if mandatory requirements are not met?‖ wonders one respondent. <br />This and other comments indicate that residents need more information about the city‘s climate <br />action plan.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.