My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
3B Public Hearing 2013 0401
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2013
>
Packet 2013 0401
>
3B Public Hearing 2013 0401
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/8/2013 4:08:07 PM
Creation date
3/26/2013 5:54:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Staff Report
Document Date (6)
4/1/2013
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
_CC Agenda 2013 0401 CS+RG
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2013\Packet 2013 0401
Reso 2013-043
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2013
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
405
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Download electronic document
View images
View plain text
Potentially <br />Significant Impact <br />Potentially Significant <br />Unless <br />Mitigation <br />Incorporated <br />Less than <br />Significant <br />. Impact No Impact <br />b. Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive <br />natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations <br />or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildjife <br />Service? •/. <br />Comment: The proDosed wind turbine was reviewed bv the California <br />Department of Fish and Game. In a letterfrom Scott Wilson, Acting <br />Regional Manager of the Bay Delta Region, several mitigation rftfeasures <br />were recommended for inclusion in this document (see Mitigation <br />Measures 1a. through 1h above). Inclusion of these Mitigation Measures <br />would reduce any impacts on riparian habitat or other sensitive <br />communities to a less than significant level. <br />;• • x Q <br />G. Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as <br />defined toy Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, <br />marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, <br />hydrological interruption, or other means? <br />Comment: The proposed wind turbine is not anticipated to have substantial <br />adverse effects on federally protected wetlands and will not result in any <br />directremoval, filling, hydrological interruption or other means. Thewind <br />. turbine is proposed to be placed on a developed property in the 1 ndustrial <br />General Zoning District. The proposal was reviewed by the California <br />Department of F1sh and Game. In a letterfrom Scott Wilson, Acting <br />Regional Manager of the Bay Delta Region, several mitigation measures <br />were recommended for inclusion in this document. No impacts to federally <br />protected wetlands were identified as the project Will not result in any direct <br />removal, filling, hydrological interruption of marshes, vernal pools, coastal <br />areas etc.'therefore no mitigations are required. <br />• • • X <br />d. Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or <br />migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or <br />migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery <br />sites? <br />Comment: The DfODOsed wind turbine Was reviewed bv the California <br />Department of Fish and Game. In a letterfrom Scott Wilson, Acting <br />Regional Manager of the Bay Delta Region, several mitigation measures <br />were recommended for inclusion, in this document (see Mitigation <br />Measures 1 a. through 1 h above). Inclusion of these Mitigation Measures <br />would reduce any impacts on native resident br wildlife species or corridors <br />to a less than significant level. . <br />•: D X • <br />e. Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological <br />resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinances? <br />Comment: The proposed wind turbine is not anticipated to conflict with <br />policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, The wind turbine is <br />proposed to be placed on a property JO the Industrial General Zoning <br />District. <br />• 0 • X <br />f. Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, <br />Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, <br />or state habitat conservation plan? <br />Comment: The DroDosed wind turbine is not anticipated to conflict with anv <br />Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan or other <br />habitat conservation plan. The wind turbine is proposed to be placed on a <br />property in the Industrial General Zoning District, <br />•. n • x <br />V. CULTURAL RESOURCES; Would the project: <br />a.. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical <br />resource as defined in Sec. 15064.5? 0 a • x <br />Comment: The orooosed wind turbine will not result in anv substantial <br />adverse change in the significance of a historical resource.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.