My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
3B Public Hearing 2013 0401
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2013
>
Packet 2013 0401
>
3B Public Hearing 2013 0401
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/8/2013 4:08:07 PM
Creation date
3/26/2013 5:54:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Staff Report
Document Date (6)
4/1/2013
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
_CC Agenda 2013 0401 CS+RG
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2013\Packet 2013 0401
Reso 2013-043
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2013
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
405
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Download electronic document
View images
View plain text
• Hydrology/Water Quality <br />x Noise <br />0 Recreation <br />O Mandatory Findings of Significance <br />• Land Use/Planning <br />• Population/Housing <br />0 Transportation/T raffic <br />x Hazards & Hazardous Materials <br />O Mineral Resources <br />0 Public Services: <br />0 Utilities/Service Systems <br />DETERMINATION: <br />On the basis of this initial evaluation: <br />D I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a <br />NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. <br />X I find that although the proposed project COULD have a significant effect on the environment, there <br />will hot be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or <br />agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. <br />0 1 find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an <br />^VlRO^^ENm iMI'W REPORT ferequitei <br />[ J I find that the proposed project WAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant <br />unless mitigated" impact on the ertyirOnrhehti but at least one effect 1) has beep adequately <br />analyzed in an earlier document pursuit to applicable legal standards, and 2) hgs been addressed <br />by mitigation measures based on th£ earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An <br />ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to <br />be addressed. <br />:• I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because <br />all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE <br />DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant <br />to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that <br />are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. <br />Date: October 11. 2012 Signature: <br />Printed name: Kathleen Livermore Title: Contract Planner <br />ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: <br />Potentially <br />Significant <br />Potentially Unless Less than <br />Signifloant Mitigation Significant No impact Impact Incorporated Impact No impact <br />I. AESTHETICS. Would the project: <br />a
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.