My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
3B Public Hearing 2013 0401
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2013
>
Packet 2013 0401
>
3B Public Hearing 2013 0401
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/8/2013 4:08:07 PM
Creation date
3/26/2013 5:54:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Staff Report
Document Date (6)
4/1/2013
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
_CC Agenda 2013 0401 CS+RG
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2013\Packet 2013 0401
Reso 2013-043
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2013
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
405
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Download electronic document
View images
View plain text
Poteniially Significant <br />frhpait <br />: Potentially Significant <br />Unless <br />Mitigation <br />. incorporated <br />Lessihan <br />Significant impact No Impact <br />b, Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act <br />contract? <br />Comment: There is no land within San Leandro that is subiect to a <br />Williamson Act contract Furthermore, the proposed wind turbine is located <br />on land zoned and used for industrial general purposes., <br />• 0 • X <br />c. Involve other changes in the existing environment which due to their <br />location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to: non- <br />agricultural use? <br />Comment: There is no designated farmland in San Leandro. <br />• • X <br />Ill, AIR QUALITY; Where available, the significance criteria <br />established by the applicable air quality management or air <br />pollution control district may be relied upon to mate the following <br />determinations, Would the project; <br />a, Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? • • • X <br />b- Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to ah existing or <br />projected air quality violation? • • • X <br />c. , Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant <br />for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal <br />6r state ambient ajr quality standard (including releasing emissions which <br />exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? <br />• • . • X <br />d. Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? • .• X <br />e. Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? <br />Comment a.-e: The oroDosed Wind turbine Wouid not create ianv air <br />emission and would not generate traffic that could contribute to cumulative <br />air quality impacts. Also, the wind turbine could provide Valuable <br />information on thte type of alternative eiiergy source, which could reduce <br />reliance on carbon-emitting fossil fuels. <br />• ' • X <br />IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project: <br />4
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.