My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
8H Consent 2013 0701
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2013
>
Packet 2013 0701
>
8H Consent 2013 0701
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/12/2013 3:23:35 PM
Creation date
6/26/2013 12:58:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Staff Report
Document Date (6)
7/1/2013
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
_CC Agenda 2013 0701 CS+RG
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2013\Packet 2013 0701
MO 2013-038
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Minute Orders\2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Download electronic document
View images
View plain text
CITY OF SAN LEANDRO <br />MEMORANDUM ON INTERNAL CONTROL <br />JUNE 30, 2012 <br /> <br />SCHEDULE PRIOR YEAR OF OTHER MATTERS <br />Review Draft 6/18/2013 5:11:57 PM <br /> <br /> <br />2011-01 Evidence of Journal Entry Review Being Reviewed <br /> <br />Criteria: <br /> <br />The City should maintain segregation of duties and adequate controls by ensuring that the person <br />charged with reviewing journal entries does not prepare and post them as well. The City should <br />also make some type of mark on the journal entry voucher to show the person reviewing is <br />separate from the person preparing and posting the entry. <br /> <br />Condition: <br /> <br />During our interim audit testing of 40 journal entries for segregation of duties and adequate <br />controls in the journal entry process, a total of 3 discrepancies were noted. 2 of the selections <br />were found to be missing proper approval prior to being posted; and 1 sample was prepared and <br />approved by the same person. After interim, the City went back and reviewed all journal entries <br />to ensure that they were all properly reviewed and authorized. During the final phase of the audit <br />we selected an additional 20 journal entries to be tested and noted no discrepancies. <br /> <br />Effect: <br /> <br />Unapproved changes could be made to journal entries or erroneous journal entries may be made <br />posted without detection and potentially leading to material misstatement in financial reporting. <br /> <br />Cause: <br /> <br />For the above noted journal entries, the City did not have segregation of duties in order to ensure <br />that the person reviewing journal entries did not post and prepare them as well. The person who <br />reviewed and approved the journal entry prior forgot to initial on the face of the journal entry <br />voucher to document that that it was reviewed and approved. <br /> <br />Recommendation: <br /> <br />The City should implement a procedure where journal entry vouchers contain evidence of review <br />and approval on the face of the document prior to being posted. There should be segregation of <br />duties and so that the journal entry preparer cannot also approve or review the same journal entry. <br /> <br />Current Status: <br />There is segregation of duty to ensure in the supervisor approved budget adjustments and journal <br />entry of the preparer. We’ll make sure that all journals entries and adjustments will be approved <br />by someone other than the preparer. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.