My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
8H Consent 2013 0701
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2013
>
Packet 2013 0701
>
8H Consent 2013 0701
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/12/2013 3:23:35 PM
Creation date
6/26/2013 12:58:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Staff Report
Document Date (6)
7/1/2013
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
_CC Agenda 2013 0701 CS+RG
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2013\Packet 2013 0701
MO 2013-038
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Minute Orders\2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Download electronic document
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />Review Draft 6/18/2013 5:11:57 PM <br /> <br />Retention Issues: We did not discuss any major issues with management regarding the <br />application of accounting principles and auditing standards that resulted in a condition to our <br />retention as the City’s auditors. <br /> <br />Difficulties: We encountered no serious difficulties in dealing with management relating to the <br />performance of the audit. <br /> <br />As discussed in Note 18 to the financial statements, the State enacted ABx1 26 and AB1484 <br />(Dissolution Laws) which dissolved California redevelopment agencies effective January 31, <br />2012. The provisions of the Dissolution Laws are extremely complex and contain provisions <br />requiring the unwinding of transactions recorded in prior years and remeasurement of amounts <br />due to the City and its component units. The Dissolution Laws also give the State Controller’s <br />Office and Department of Finance approval powers over transactions and asset transfers and <br />require a plethora of filings, processes and special procedures to be performed by external audit <br />firms. These matters required an exorbitant amount of staff’s time and attention. This in turn had <br />an adverse effect on audit timing and effort. <br /> <br />Audit Adjustments: For purposes of this communication, professional standards define an audit <br />adjustment, whether or not recorded by the City, as a proposed correction of the financial <br />statements that, in our judgment, may not have been detected except through the audit procedures <br />performed. These adjustments may include those proposed by us, but not recorded by the City, <br />that could potentially cause future financial statements to be materially misstated, even though we <br />have concluded that the adjustments are not material to the current financial statements. <br /> <br />We did not propose any audit adjustments that, in our judgment, could have a significant effect, <br />either individually or in the aggregate, on the City’s financial reporting process. <br /> <br />Uncorrected Misstatements: Professional standards require us to accumulate all known and <br />likely misstatements identified during the audit, other than those that are trivial, and communicate <br />them to the appropriate level of management. We have no such misstatements to report to the <br />City Council. <br /> <br />****** <br /> <br />This report is intended solely for the information and use of the City Council, its committees, and <br />management and is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than these <br />specified parties. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.